Appendix 4: Testimonies Presented to the Tribunal

INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF INQUIRY SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FINDINGS THE NEXUS RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDICES MAPS GLOSSARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INDEX HOME
Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7

The following are excerpts from selected testimonies presented to the Tribunal prior to April 1999.

1. The mountains of war 18. Anti-insurgency and food scarcity
2. War and hunger in the 1990s 19. The social costs of government policy
3. Displaced 20. Taxation, relocation, starvation
4. A village teacher 21. A farmer’s lot
5. Another offensive 22. A landless worker
6. A hillside farmer 23. Forced relocation
7. An elder’s thoughts 24. The reality of agricultural development
8. Demoralized communities 25. Separation for survival
9. Flight 26. Food scarcity in the delta
10. The army is not easy to work with 27. A teacher’s lament
11. Building roads, going hungry 28. The summer paddy program
12. The cost of living 29. An outspoken elder
13. We wandered from place to place 30. No more livelihood
14. No living things 31. Death of a child
15. Shouldering the load 32. A fisherman
16. No rest for the farmers 33. A failed irrigation scheme
17. Everything left behind 34. A civil servant

Return to Top 1. The mountains of war Next

P'deh War, a 19 year old male student from Papun Township, Karen State.

On 28 March 1997, the Burma army started a strong offensive in our township. The KNU soldiers are very short on ammunition, having no more than about 20 bullets per weapon, so they heard that the Burma army order was- "If the KNU shoots once, shoot ten times; if they shoot ten times, shoot 100 times; if they shoot 100 times, shoot at them all day."

None of the villages has more than about 40 houses- all are small mountain communities. Every house has a barn. The Burma army soldiers began along the Bilin River valley, at a village called Ta Me Der. They entered burned all the houses, rice, and the villagers’ possessions. Virtually everything was destroyed, except a few caches of rice successfully hidden in the jungle.

On April 3, IB 51 soldiers entered Thay Khoh Mu Der village and all the villagers evacuated without preparing any food for themselves. This became a big problem when they fled into the deep forest and couldn't get any food. They had nothing to eat. The Burma army troops slept in the village, and after eating pigs and chickens, they burned down 36 houses and 14 barns containing 200-400 baskets of paddy each. They saw a place where villagers had hidden about 80 baskets. The villagers had no food, so some decided to come back for the hidden rice. So five men fearfully returned, and just before they arrived they saw the soldiers, so they deliberated, "Do we dare to go back and take the grain?" And one said, "Never mind, we will go back. If we die, we'll die together and if we survive, we'll survive together." They had walked barely a few more steps when the soldiers opened fire. One of them, named Phar Khin Sein, aged 50, was killed. The other four escaped. After that the soldiers burned the 80 baskets of rice.

In total, 67 houses and 55 barns were burned down within a few days, as well as 10 hidden rice stores, each with about 40 baskets of grain. Later, the villagers faced serious food and shelter problems- they were forced into the jungle. Having destroyed all these places and this food the soldiers returned to Ker Gaw Lo, which they had not destroyed, and took porters. Rather than flee, the village elders tried to negotiate with the soldiers. The army demanded 4000 kyat from each person not going to serve as a porter.

The soldiers destroyed and burned all the people's property. On April 8, IB 135 entered Hkeh Pa Htah village and burned all 38 houses and 23 paddy barns containing 100- 200 baskets grain each, and ate two buffaloes. All the villagers, about 2000 in number, fled before their arrival and hid in Hkoh Khi forest. Many villagers from surrounding areas had already fled to Hkeh Pa Htah. They brought with them enough food for one month, so in the forest they felt very tired and worried about their future. If the army withdrew the people would return and try to sow a crop. If not, there was no way to survive in the jungle, so then they would probably be forced to go to Thailand.

This unit of soldiers came bit by bit until making their rendezvous with the other unit [IB 51] at Thay Khoh Mu Der. The two groups began to consolidate all people around the army camps. Those villagers staying outside their control, even children or the elderly, would be treated as insurgents.

They proceeded to burn down Doh Daw Khi, Mu Khi, Too Gaw So, Hti Thaw Pe Khi, and Hkeh Der villages. The first was Doh Daw Khi, where 20 houses were burned down. They also burned down 17 barns there. The total number of houses in these villages, in addition to Doh Daw Khi, would be about 80. Immediately after that, the soldiers entered Maw Law village where all of the villagers, 10 families, fled as quickly as possible to rendezvous at the big caves in the forest. They had taken very little food and had to eat porridge for three weeks until some KNU solders escorted them to Yeh Mu Plaw area. They travelled by night in small groups. The soldiers shot at 30 buffalo at Maw Hsar Plaw. Those not killed were blinded and could not graze. The army left a note, "These animals were support for KNU, so they are our enemies, therefore we had the right to kill them."

Furthermore, they burned 18 houses in Ti Thoo Der and left a message on a tree which said "Kill the Karen race!" The villagers fled to the forest for more than three weeks. There were more than 200 people. On April 28, it rained very hard, so a lot of the people got fevers, especially the children, and there was no medicine. The people were drinking water from the streams. As for food, most had managed to bring some rice and salt. Apart from that, they had to forage for vegetables in the jungle. Most people ate one or two cups of rice per day. I asked some villagers, "If the route opens up, will you cross into Thailand?" They answered, "We absolutely won't. We will live or die in these mountains. If we die we'll die together. If we eat, then we'll eat together."

According to a report by Saw Dee Gay Htoo in October 1998, the Yeh Mu Plaw region continues to experience serious incursions as part of the 1998-99 offensive. He also managed to make contact at the end of December 1998, and reported that at that time the Burma army troops were stepping up the regional offensive, spear-headed by the destruction of all and any crops and food stocks already made scarce by poor weather conditions.


Return to Top 2. War and hunger in the 1990s Next

Saw Htoo K'baw, a 36 year old teacher and father of five from Papun Township, Karen State.

I arrived in Papun Township in 1981. I went to help the people there, and as a high school graduate I was given a teaching position in the [KNU] high school. Until 1992, conditions weren't too tough. At first, the school committee provided me with food and some money, which was adequate. But in January 1992, the Burma army began to battle KNU. They patrolled and skirmished, and 1992 was the first year that we had food problems.

Before all that our area was pretty stable. Less secure places faced regular fighting, causing people to flee into safer areas like ours. There was increasing population pressure over time. When I left earlier this year [1997] the village had reached more than 200 houses, compared to the typical village size of only 30 houses. Originally, apart from growing rice, people had no problems earning a living by fishing; breeding livestock; growing and foraging for vegetables; cutting timber and trading. KNU taxes were reasonable- one basket of paddy per acre and a little bit more for sugarcane. However, over time it became harder to live by agriculture. Soil fertility suffered. Land should lie fallow for at least a three or four years, but nowadays it’s two years at most. That's because of growing populations people move further away from government control. The land is totally exhausted.

After 1992, I also grew my own rice. I planted 3-4 baskets of seed the first year. Because the soldiers were patrolling and the soil was poor I didn’t harvest enough to feed my family, only 5 baskets. After school closed in January, I planned to trade in biscuits, Ajinomoto and clothing. The soldiers began patrolling because of people trading in this way, and they would stop people on the road or shoot at them if far away. I only attempted to trade goods this one time, in 1992. As I was returning with my goods in a group of 5 people, some Burma army soldiers who were off to one side of the path saw us and shot at us. We all dropped our possessions and ran for our lives. So, I lost all my valuables and was discouraged from further trading activities.

By 1994 more villagers had come, the village was getting crowded and dirty, and people were getting sick. Most children under 5 were ill. One illness was "yellow eyes." Apart from the yellowness in the eyes and face, the children's livers were swollen. About 20% of children under five died. Only with urgent medical treatment could they possibly hope to survive. Their skin and eyes yellowed and their livers enlarged. At first people didn't think too much of it and used traditional medicines. When that didn’t work, the people tried to get help from outside, but it was too late.

Pu Ta Thoo, a neighbor of mine, lost a two-month-old baby. He went to get a KNU medic, but the child had already been sick for 3 or 4 days. Anyway, the medic had nothing for this illness, only paracetemol and quinine. Pu Ta Thoo had no money for medicine; intravenous drips from Thailand are very expensive, and medicines from inside Burma are unreliable. So the child died. The mother was also ill, weak with fever and headache, although. My family faced the illness too, and what's more we had to flee from the Burma army and stay at the bottom of a river valley. We didn't have spare clothing or mosquito nets, so the children suffered chills.

Work became harder. The soil was losing its fertility. The soldiers patrolled at the time of the harvest, and so crops were destroyed and went bad. Starting from September 1994 my family had to eat rice porridge. Sometimes I had to go without food to feed my family. Sometimes all we had to eat were boiled bamboo shoots and roots.

In 1995, because of constant Burma army movement, we had to be ready all the time. In the hot season I worked odd jobs. The school committee couldn’t take care of teachers anymore. We couldn't buy any clothes, and had only one set each. Some newer arrivals risked their lives by returning to their old villages. My children were coughing terribly, but I had no money for medicine. I searched far and wide for money, but couldn't earn enough. I just made certain that I boiled all drinking water for my children.

In September I planted two baskets of rice seed. It was almost harvest time when we fled to where there was no food. As we had not brought much food, we ate eat rice porridge. For two or three months we hid, and our fields were trampled by livestock and destroyed by the soldiers. I would forego food so my children could eat. I would go around and beg for rice. Some people would take pity and give one or two cups- mostly these were hill people who were coping better than the rest of us. It's true that by this time people suffered differently. Most who had migrated more recently and were living off agriculture or fishing were suffering considerably. Traders and the traditional hill people were managing better. We only cooked one small pot of rice per meal. We had one pot, but no plates, bowls or cutlery, so we ate from bamboo. In 1996 things became so tough that we couldn't even get salt anymore, which used to come in from Papun. But by this time all roads had been cut. No one dared travel secretly, afraid to be shot along the way.

Villages on the other side of the river suffered more, because they received little warning when the soldiers came. They suffered constant harassment, and they never had enough food. In spite of all this they didn't want to move. From June to August of 1996 they ate porridge and bamboo shoots, and from September to November they ate roots. My family ate like this until the December harvest. That year I planted three baskets and reaped 15.

In early November 1996, my uncle was killed. His name was Phar Maung Kyaw. He was about 47 years old, and had 4 children. The troops were approaching as he prepared to flee, but he didn’t know how close they were. His wife left first and he followed, but he took the wrong path and ran into the soldiers. His wife heard the gun fire but did not know what had happened. After a couple of days went by she understood that it was her husband who had been shot. All the villagers were terrified, and for over a week none of them went back. However KNU soldiers saw the corpse, which had been shot in the head and chest.

In 1996 we fled three times. Each time we had no food, no grain with us, and so we all foraged for roots. The first time was when we were preparing the fields, during March; once during May-June; once during the harvest in October-November, on each occasion for 1 to 3 weeks. If the soldiers used a familiar approach we usually had enough warning to prepare, but sometimes they came down from the mountains by surprise, so we had to flee with nothing. Even if people prepared they would only be able to carry enough food for 4 or 5 days, one week at most. In the forest relationships varied. Some shared their food with others, knowing that it would run out quickly, and then left to look for roots together, others did not. The last time, I saw one family especially close to utter starvation, the two small children crying from hunger. The mother pitifully fed them roots which had been boiled enough. She probably knew that they would make them sick but didn't know what else to do. After that they experienced nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. They had absolutely no possessions whatsoever, other than one pot, a machete and a small blanket. For shelter people made small bamboo frames which they covered with leaves or plastic. During the rainy season we also had to make a floor to sleep on.

By this time the army units usually killed anybody they saw in the village. Around April, it rained very heavily for about a week. Our house collapsed into the river and was totally destroyed, we were left with nothing, no food and no place to stay, so we fled and hid. The children were sick, and a KNU administrator gave me some grain. I thought about the situation, and thought that as we had lost our house and possessions we wouldn't stay there anymore, and so we came to this refugee camp step by step.

By 1997 it was easy to flee, we had nothing left anyway. We had lost, sold or exchanged all our meager possessions over time in order to get food. We never had much, but before 1992-93 we had 4 or 5 items of clothing each, enough blankets, mosquito nets, plates and spoons to go around. By 1997, my wife, our three oldest children and I had exactly one set of clothes each, and our youngest two children we simply wrapped in rags, and carried them on our backs when we fled. A machete, a pot and a bamboo bowl, some rice, two blankets and one mosquito net were the sum total of our possessions. Under such conditions money is not spent on clothes and such, you only think about getting food. Whether I taught in the school, worked the fields, or slept at home, I only had one shirt to wear. If our children suffered diarrhea and spoiled their pants, then we washed them and dried them in front of the fire, in time for school.

If we look at all of this, then we can say that because of the Burma Army offensive and destruction starting from 1992, transport was restricted and prices were on the rise. Travel is difficult and it isn't possible to get medicines, food is scarce. There is increasing sickness and it is more difficult to earn a living. That the Burma army soldiers are deliberately creating starvation astonishes people. When it is almost time for people to burn the fields, the army terrorizes people so that they are too afraid to stay in their fields. They move all over the place and approach from different routes. Finally, the rains have come, causing the troops to withdraw. Then the villagers have to start work to get food during the rains. When the crop is almost ready, the troops come back again and go directly to the fields and trample the plants when they are due for harvest. The villagers again flee to the forest, leaving their cattle behind, and this also becomes a problem, as the animals roam around eating the crops. All this leaves villagers totally distraught and with no idea how to feed themselves in the future. All villagers suffer in the same way, this is not just a once-off event, and so are utterly discouraged as to how to work for a livelihood.


Return to Top 3. Displaced Next

Kyay Mi, a male farmer from Papun Township, Karen State.

We came to Thailand because of too many problems from the Burma army soldiers. We had to pay porter fees and then we thought that we'd be left alone, but they still gang-pressed us into porter service. They burned our houses and food supplies and it is plain to see that we could never stay on there. We were afraid for the safety of our lives. The army deploys its troops close together and sends out patrols to harm the people and destroy villages. Most villagers have been forced to move and stay hidden from the troops. At the moment they are surviving on last year’s harvest. But next year if they can’t find food then they will flee into Thailand. But the trip is hazardous and you have to bring enough food to last along the way. Some of us didn't have enough rice and had to borrow from others. So you can see that these are the problems facing us: scarcity of food, rainy weather and the soldiers. Along the way one baby in our group died, and two elderly people suffered acute health problems. There was no medicine.

At present the soldiers are building barracks, so they required villagers to carry loads, hack wood and do all sorts of things for them. Workers have to provide their own food. Some managed to flee from the most difficult areas. If people move and find that they can not plant then they move again, otherwise they'd starve the next year. We heard news that the strategic commander said operations were done in that area. But others heard that they would begin another operation. If that happens, the people will be in great danger. The commander told people that if they want to run away, they should either run very far or stay close to the army. If they find people in the jungle they shoot on sight. Only when there is peace in our country will the people survive and prosper. If it is not so, the people will still have to bear heavy burdens. People like us will come here, and the rest will die.

Source: Burma Issues video tape #17A/154, September 1997


Return to Top 4. A village teacher Next

Naw Eh Paw Htoo, a 33 year old woman from Myawaddy Township, Karen State.

In March 1997, there was increasing suffering and poverty in my village. I was there together with my four children and husband, my house and my land, which yielded 600 baskets of paddy grain. Before the fighting we ate okay. From 1984 to 1988, I was teaching at Taung Oke. In 1985-86, the army reached and destroyed our village, but they left and people came back. In 1989, they again reached the village, destroyed my stuff and burned down my house and shop. But they went away and I still dared to stay. When I married in 1989, my husband and I moved to another village where we planted rice and raised livestock. We could work peacefully and the KNU taxation wasn't much. It was easy and we had enough to eat.

From 1990 through 1996, we were reasonably well off. There were no problems, and only in this year, 1997, did we face real problems. What we met with was very different from before, when the Burma army came, destroyed some things and went away. This time, they came to stay beside the village, and we always had to go to help them, and they came into the village and destroyed things like our household possessions, and entered our houses to get food, so we had to feed them. Anything they didn't eat they discarded, especially food like paddy grain, threshed grain, root plants and small livestock. The soldiers who came to control our area were Battalion 425, commanded by Kyaw Zaw Aung. They destroyed household possessions and destroyed our rice grain. They also took and ate our pigs and chickens. Anything that they didn't eat, they killed, and likewise rice grain that they couldn't carry away, they set on fire. So we really faced problems for our food. On a day to day basis we could still eat, but over a longer time we would surely have starved. Because we couldn't travel around, we couldn't work. We always had to follow their orders and only do things for them. They will surely force the villagers into starvation. Even if I only look at my household, we had to frequently face problems; I can't even count how many times. My children suffered from sicknesses such as diarrhea and malaria, as a result of sometimes having to flee and so often not having clean food.

The soldiers stayed in the village, therefore we had to see them every day and almost every day they impoverished the villagers. They demanded the villagers threshed rice, and said that their own rations weren’t tasty, but the villagers' rice was tasty. They eat the poultry for free. They demanded people's pigs and said that whether big or small they would give 3,000 kyat per pig. Before I fled I had to sell one of my pigs this way. It would have been worth 1,500 to 2,000 Thai baht but I had to sell it for 3,000 kyat. I also had 4-5 buffalo, and after I came here I heard that the Burma army shot and ate one of them.

Now I have come here, and none of my four children are well. Before fleeing, we lived in fear and we made the children sleep in the fields, without any mosquito nets. My oldest child has malaria, and the middle two are also getting fevers everyday, so they have to take medicines. The youngest has diarrhea and anemia, and also has to take medicines.

I know that if I had stayed in the village [rather than come to the refugee camp] for a longer time, I would have faced more suffering and poverty, sickness and death, because the village no longer had access to a clinic and the Burma army soldiers did not take care of people, only always terrified them. I came to the refugee camp because I was unable to stay in my village as a result of the soldiers confiscation and destruction of my food, rice and possessions on a daily basis. If I had stayed in my village for an extended period of time I would surely have starved. So before my family reached the point of starvation we fled to this refugee camp. If I had stayed in my village I would surely have died. A lot of the villagers who are still there will also come. I could not bring anything with me. My house and land are still there. There was still 20 baskets of threshed rice in my rice store. I had to leave all of that.

I can't think about staying in my village now. I won't ever go back until the situation in the country has changed.


Return to Top 5. Another offensive Next

Naw Tha Kyeh, a 45 year old woman from Myawaddy Township, Karen State, speaking in July 1997.

We were working as farmers and had been able to trade our crops easily. The Burma army troops first came into the village in 1986 and later again in 1993. Each time they came, they took paddy and rice stocks and destroyed our property. They subjected villagers to extra-judicial arrest, torture and murder, causing most people in our area to flee into Thailand each time. We suffered serious losses to our farms, gardens and livestock. Only after they left, were we able to return and reconstruct.

In February of 1997, they launched a new offensive. This time our people were unable to flee. The army said all livestock and grain supported the KNU and proceeded to burn, loot and destroy it all. The cattle and buffalo were either taken away to be eaten or shot. Any villagers who pleaded with them to do otherwise were ignored. The worst thing was that when it was time to begin tilling our lands, the soldiers denied us permission. They forced us instead to build their barracks, construct roads for their supply lines, be their guides and simply stay at the sites of their camps without any work at all. We were not able to go and sell any of the remaining fruit and vegetables from our farms. They blocked all trading activities.

Not only did they confiscate our paddy, but they also did not allow us to prepare our farms for the coming season, which poses a serious threat of starvation. Consequently, some of us were determined to risk death by crossing the border areas. Some have made it to the refugee camps, others have been caught by the Burma army troops and murdered or tortured brutally.


Return to Top 6. A hillside farmer Next

Phar Too Ngar, a 40 year old from Kya-Inn Seik Kyi Township, Karen State, speaking in 1997-98.

I stayed in my village for 30 years and worked as a paddy farmer. I also grew vegetables, betel nut palms and rubber trees. In 1992-93, the village flooded, so we stopped working those fields. That year we frequently ate rotten rice, because the rice store was wet. After that I started to work swidden fields, from 1994 to 1997. My swidden fields yielded about 108 baskets per year, and I re-sowed 10 baskets.

Until January 1997, our village only had to pay low KNU taxes and work conditions were good. Starting then, we faced increasing poverty. When the Burma army soldiers first entered, they made people construct their army camp and begin a road to Kyaik Done. The villagers had to work for three days, rest for one day, on rotation. Work was begun in January. Villagers who didn't go had to give 1200 kyat for three days, direct to the soldiers. For construction of the road, some villagers had to give up agricultural land, but did not receive any compensation. At least 30 households had to leave land and houses to make way for the road. I too lost some of my rubber plantation and vegetable gardens.

There is no longer any time for villagers to get food for themselves. Only the army's work can be done. The soldiers made people construct two big rice stores- to contain 400-500 baskets of grain each- and then made villagers contribute one cup of rice per person per day. They were still doing this when I left.

As there is no longer enough food in the village, people are developing bad characteristics. Some are stealing rice to eat. A lot of villagers don't have enough to eat, so they want to come to Thailand, but they can't come easily. Army units are stationed all around the village. If they see people who are leaving secretly, they threaten to shoot them.

Since the Burma army entered the village there have also been more deaths. Some elderly people terrified by the soldiers have died from heart problems. Soldiers pick fights with villagers everyday. They drink and accuse villagers of cooperating with KNU.

Villagers can do only the army's work, constructing roads and other forms of labor. If soldiers see villagers going to do their own work then they ask, "Where did you get permission from? Who gave you permission?" They confiscate carts and bulls. They threaten that if anybody shoots at them in the village then it will become ash. They are building shops on villagers' land and then make them buy the shops for 5000 kyat each, and every month charge 500 kyat as tax per shop. Some people who lost their houses due to the road construction have been instructed to purchase them

When I first left, my objective was to take my wife to be cured of tuberculosis in a refugee camp clinic. A week after I came, I heard that my house, my vegetable gardens and all my land was destroyed, so I no longer want to go back. They must have thought that I came to contact KNU. The total value of all my possessions would have been 100,000 Thai baht.

By the time I left, 40 households in the village were already facing serious hunger. Everybody is suffering poverty. If they stay in the village for a long time then they will die of starvation.

Saw Canady, an information collector in the region who also witnessed these events, forwarded the following details..

In February 1997, Burma army troops of LIBs 203, 205 of Division 22 and LIB 505 of Division 77 launched military operations in Kyeik, Kwin Kale, Dan Kalaw and Thay Phat Htaw village areas. 25-30 villagers from each village in the area have since had to serve on forced labor projects such as road constructions, rice barn constructions and serve as guides.

The workers include men, women and children, all of whom have to supply their own food and medicines while doing the work. They have had to construct two big rice barns on high ground near Kyeik village to store the supplies from surrounding villages, and ration it back out to the villagers.

Houses that stood in the fields outside of villages were shifted and rebuilt inside. Also all livestock had to be moved in. The troops robbed the villagers property and when the owners asked for things to be returned, they intimidated them into silence.

The Muslim populations at Kyaik Done and Pah Kalaw Ni villages were evicted and denied their possessions. They told the Muslims, "This is not your place, go back to your country." I witnessed 90 bullock carts and cattle, buffaloes and goats belonging to Muslims being confiscated by the Burma army troops. The Muslims had to leave their properties with tears in their eyes.

They have made house registers and villagers are issued with documents. Those without documents are classified as rebels. Bullock carts and motor cars are being commandeered to transport food and ammunitions. They are levying taxes on cars and elephants.

The army has given guarantees that it will treat people well. But in practice, their troops commit daylight robbery, gang-press labor, and extortion. Because of all this the villagers are full of woe and misery. The army does not allow anybody carrying belongings while traveling to prevent people from fleeing.


Return to Top 7. An elder’s thoughts Next

Phu Kar Hsu, a 55 year old father of seven children from Kya-Inn Seik Kyi Township, Karen State.

The Burma army arrived at our village about 2 months back, in March 1997. Some of us fled to the border area and some stayed behind in hiding, to watch how things went.

My family and I came to a refugee camp when the army started its campaign. Later, I went back to my farm, to have a look at the situation. The troops there were from Division 44. They were forcing people to work as porters and guides, interroging people and beating them. They confiscated property and livestock which they sold and ate. They gave villages orders to relocate, to separate them from the KNU.

They also seized people from the surrounding villages and forced them to carry army rations. Those who could not cope were beaten and abused. They treated porters whom they had brought with them from far away very badly, and eventually killed them.

Within a week of arrival, the soldiers ordered two bullock carts and three people from each surrounding village go to the Division 44 camp at Kwi Kler daily. Each village also had to provide 20 to 25 laborers to work on road constructions daily. Every person had to work the entire day, providing their own food and medicines. All buildings and trees in the path of the road construction had to be pulled down. The soldiers also extorted money and belongings from villagers.

When I went to the market in Kwi Kler village, I met a soldier who searched my bag and I had to give him 200 kyat. The troops there tried to sell buffalo, cattle and other looted goods, but the villagers knew where these things were coming from and refused to buy them. I heard a villager speak to one of these soldiers: "Look here, we've been tilling the land and raising livestock here for so many years, and we have just a few animals. As for you, you've been here for such a short time, you don't till the land or rear animals, and yet you seem to own more than we do. How come?" The soldier replied, "Uncle, as we know each other so well, I do not think I need to answer your question."


Return to Top 8. Demoralized communities Next

Lein May Aye, a 24 year old mother of two from Kya-Inn Seik Kyi Township, Karen State.

About five months ago, in February 1997, the Burma army troops of Division 44 came into our village. It has about 30 houses. Most of the people are traditional farmers. These troops are stationed at Kyaik Done and whenever they come, they shoot and kill our livestock at random, and also confiscate our belongings. They make people serve as porters and guides, and go to work in their army camp every day. All the males in the village were forced to work as porters when they first arrived, and later we had to provide five workers each day.

Initially this work was being done during the hot season when we had little work of our own to do, so although the burden was heavy, we could bear it. But later, when we had to attend to our farm work, clearing the hill plantations and so on, it was a more difficult situation. They also confiscated the paddy that the villagers keep for home consumption, so villagers are left starving. Many of the villagers in the area are no longer able to spend any time working for their own livelihoods as they have to give all of their energy to support the Burma army troops labor requirements. The types of work commonly required include building barracks at their camps, carrying arms and ammunition, serving as guides, doing sentry work and sending messages.

Eight households left our village and we met up with four from Win Lone village, so in total over 60 people ended up coming. We took six days to prepare for the journey to Thailand. We brought a week’s food supply: just salt, chilies and rice. No medicines for people who became ill. But on the 18th, we encountered a group of Burma army troops who fired at us, and we scattered. I ran and found my way to an old woman farming a hill plantation, and stayed there for a while. Later she guided me to Thailand. Of the people who started the journey in my group from our village, only fifteen made it here. I’m not sure about all the others. I heard that some were caught by the soldiers and taken back to Kyaw Htah and Azin. Some others are still hiding in the jungle and some gave up and went back to their villages.

Many of the villagers are demoralized. Since the army onslaught, most villagers have left our place. I think very few will still be there now. Villagers can no longer get any earnings, and if they fail to meet soldiers’ demands then they are beaten and abused. They will not be able to get enough rice for the coming year. In front-line areas, officers sell their supplies and feed off the rice and food belonging to the villagers. I think no one would like to stay in their villages any more. If they have any chance to come here they’ll do so, although if they become aware of the danger they’ll meet on the way then they’ll surely be discouraged.


Return to Top 9. Flight Next

Saw Heh Nay, a 48 year old father of four children, from Kya-Inn Seik Kyi Township, Karen State.

In July 1997, Battalion 230 demanded that people in our village serve as porters. The loads were unbearably heavy. If we could not carry them then they beat and kicked us. We had to carry one and a half baskets of rice each. We had to carry them for 4-7 days. If we could not carry them then they started beating us. I myself never got beaten, but I saw other people beaten.

They ordered seven villages relocate to Waw Loo. If anyone refused to go, or if they saw people in any other places, they said that they would recognize them as their enemy and kill them all. They did not send the orders by letter. They came into the village, called a village meeting and spoke directly to the people. When they move the villagers to the new site they will make fences and restrict villagers activities.

For these reasons I came to Thailand. If we stayed there, our lives would be ruined. We came in a group of 50 villagers. It was a very hard journey, because we had to find ways safe from the Burma army. It took three weeks to arrive. Currently, we don't have any problems. But if the Thai authorities do not allow us to stay here, we can't do anything. We cannot go back, we dare not go back and face the soldiers.

Source: Burma Issues video tape #17A/152


Return to Top 10. The army is not easy to work with Next

Saw Sein Thaung, Ta La Ku Religious and Cultural Preservation General Secretary, from Hlaing Bwe Township, Karen State.

I am responsible for the preservation of the Ta La Ku [a traditional animist sect] religious and cultural norms. Being under control of the military government is very hard. The Burma army called us to go back from Thailand and work together with them for a better life. It was very difficult to work together with the army. We had to do everything they told us to do. The only burden we could not bear was portering. The loads were enough for horses and elephants to carry. If we could not carry them then they kicked us and beat us severely.

We called a community meeting with other Ta La Ku people. We agreed that we would come to Lay Taw Kho [a Ta La Ku village in Thailand]. If we stayed in our village then we would get more and more trouble. A lot of people came. The Burma army asked us to go back. They said that they won't treat us badly the way they've done before. They said that they won't ask us to work, but we don’t trust them. We told them that if they want us to go back, then let their authorities come to our place and make a magical oath in front of our religious leader that they won't oppress us any more. They sent a message in reply that "there is no way the Tatmadaw will obey orders from villagers."

We left all our property and rice stocks in our village. We don't have food and we have no rice fields here in Lay Taw Kho, so I asked people, "What are we going to do about this situation?" We want to go to a place where we can get rice, but when we think about our religion, we cannot go because the way we eat and the way we live is different from other people. If we go there, we will lose our religion. So we will have to stay here and die with our religion.

Source: Burma Issues video tape #17A/152


Return to Top 11. Building roads, going hungry Next

Kyaw Me, a 40 year old man from Hlaing Bwe Township, Karen State.

Our village has about 150 households. About 50 households have their own paddy fields. The others work swidden crops and seek daily wages. Sundry workers earn about 75 kyat per day, or are often paid one pyi of rice. There are monthly taxes on every household, such as 100 kyat porter fees and 50 kyat messenger fees. The administration collects a paddy quota and pays only 250 kyat per basket.

From 1996 to the present, about 60 households have not had enough to eat. These are mostly sundry workers. They have to beg for grain from others. They have to give too many taxes now, and the expenses of farming are also going up. Especially now, the only thing that matters is to work for the military, constructing roads and camps. On 1 April 1997, a Division 99 officer ordered us to construct a road from our village to Hlaing Bwe. Each household must go three days at a time, and take their own food. The work is from 5 a.m. to 6 p.m. The officer also demanded 200 kyat from every house for the purchase of sand and gravel. People who don't go to work on the road must give 500 kyat to the military per household for three days. For these reasons, in the future there will be serious food shortages.


Return to Top 12. The cost of living Next

Nyein Chan, a fisherman with six children from Hlaing Bwe Township, Karen State, speaking in 1997.

In 1996-97, we have had to work on road constructions. The length of road that each village must construct varies with the village size. We have to take our own food and materials. Soldiers come and eat our food, so we feed both ourselves and them. In order to feed them we have to collect money from people. They said they would provide half the food during construction, but each village received only one sack of rice. That's about one cup of rice per person.

Due to high taxes, youths have to work in Thailand. In some houses only old women and girls are left, but they have to go and work on the roads anyway. In some houses, there is only one old mother and one child left. If the mother cannot go, the child must go.

For the sake of economic progress, the military government says that people will have to buy water pumps and grow rice during the dry season. But this won't happen. If farmers are to grow during the dry season they'll have to buy fertilizer, which costs at least 1800 kyat per sack. Petroleum is 130 kyat per gallon. If costs are so high, farmers won't be able to do this work. But if they don't do as instructed then they can no longer work as farmers.

Most villagers in my area earn their livelihoods fishing. We have to give tax to the village council. We pay taxes, but then the soldiers demand fish every day. We get a reasonable amount of fish and an income from this work, but that income is no longer equivalent to the cost of living. Food is expensive, we have to give taxes, and in our village there is a People's Militia unit whom we have to feed and pay wages. These are not just the conditions in Karen State. When I went to Mawlamyine [Mon State] I saw soldiers arresting people to serve as porters. For 15,000 kyat you could go free. In Burma, if you have money then you can do a lot.


Return to Top 13. We wandered from place to place Next

Naw Ble, a 40 year old mother of nine and swidden farmer from Taninthayi Township, Tenasserim Division.

Our village has 30-40 families. In February 1997 the Burma army troops entered a nearby village, so we all ran away in fear. We wandered from place to place, and learned that troops were passing through our village regularly. We also learned that the animals had all been eaten. Some of the coconut and betel nut palms had been chopped down by soldiers.

After wandering in the jungle for more than one and a half months, we felt there were no more places to go. Some people suggested going back would be better than being caught in the jungle. So one day when there were no soldiers in the village, we re-entered.

We saw all our possessions scattered, and no cock crowed, no dog barked, no cat cried and no cattle wandered about the place. Everything was quiet. The next day, troops started to dig trenches by our houses. They did not harm us, but would climb our trees and take fruit. They ordered us not to leave the village without permission. To go out cost 15 kyat per day, and we had to be back before dark.

They ordered us to bring our paddy from where we hid it, or they would find and destroy it. Some brought the rice and it was confiscated. The soldiers ate it. At the same time, soldiers went house-to-house selling ration rice for 50 kyat a pyi. We pay to work our own plantations, we serve them without wages, our paddy is looted then we buy back rice to survive. Our fruit and crops are taken, our animals and plants are taken, we are unable to escape. They told us troops in the hills have orders to kill anything they see. We are haunted by this.

Source: KNU Mergui-Tavoy Information Office, Situation Report on Internally Displaced People inside Mergui/Tavoy Distict Areas, 22 August 1997


Return to Top 14. No living things Next

Saw Ke Hko, a 30 year old male farmer from Taninthayi Township, Tenasserim Division.

My village has 50 houses. In February 1997, LIB 433 entered the village and we all fled. Later some of the villagers went to Kaw Maw Pro to try to buy salt and other goods, and two were detained by soldiers. The soldiers tried to persuade the two to organize other villagers to return to our village. They promised to build a school, clinic and other development projects.

The two returned and told us what the soldiers said. We dared not believe them, we were frightened. However, the pastor went to see the situation. He came back and told us the army would not harm us if we returned, but if we continued to hide outside the village, they would not guarantee our safety. So we returned and saw everything broken and scattered. The houses contained no living things and the trees were bare of any fruit. The skin and bones of our animals were spread everywhere and the place was swarming with flies. We started to repair our houses. LIB 433 returned the next day, they built trenches by the houses. No one was allowed to go outside the village. Those wanting to go to their plantations had to pay 15 kyat per person per day. No one was allowed to stay outside overnight. Everyone had to be back before dark.

Every two days, two people had to go to the commander in the village, provide a boat each and serve as guides on the river. I was ordered to be a permanent guide. I had no time to help my family. We also had to make a front-line hospital, a rice store and an office for them.

We sneaked out at night along with nine other families. We had only been back in the village for three weeks. We could carry only a little rice with us, but after two days we met some KNU soldiers who offered us some more.

I feel bitter about the troops staying in our village, looting our rice and eating it, then selling us their rations. We have very little money to buy rice. Think about it! How long can we survive without any time to earn money?

Source: KNU Mergui-Tavoy Information Office, Situation Report on Internally Displaced People inside Mergui/Tavoy Distict Areas, 22 August 1997


Return to Top 15. Shouldering the load Next

Aung Win Thein, a 35 year old fisherman with four children from Thayet Chaung Township, Tenasserim Division.

In my village, Burma army troops demand porter fees one, two or three times a month. It is not the same each month. As time goes by, villagers cannot afford to pay, so they have to go instead. They demand 2-3 villagers per time, because my village is small. If they do not get porters through the village authorities, they come and capture villagers themselves.

I do not remember the date I started serving as a porter. I think I had been serving for one month and three days when I fled from porter duty in July 1998. After LIBs 373 and 380 demanded porters from our village, we had to draw lots, and I ended up on the list. Last year I already had to serve as a porter once. On that trip, when we arrived at Aing Win village I sneaked away.

This time, I was sent to Thayet Chaung police station and had to spend one night there. In the morning, we were sent to IB 25 in Dawei. We had to wait there for 3 days. There were 70-80 porters there, from several villages. We had to buy food. The military did not feed us. From there, we were sent to Myitta village, east of Dawei, and spent one night there.

In the morning we had to follow LIBs 373 and 380 in separate columns. We had to carry one basket of rice each. I was in the first column of 45 porters. We traveled down the Tenasserim River. After five days, we arrived in Htee Hta, where the army had set up a big camp. On the way, we had very little time to rest, just once every 2-3 hours of walking. Those who could not bear their burdens were beaten and kicked. I was kicked or hit not less than 50 times. My burden was really heavy, so that whenever we had to walk up slopes it became difficult to step forward. At those moments, I was hit by the soldiers. On the way, I saw three porters’ corpses. One of them died simply while drinking water, because he was too weak and tired. Another four porters were left in the jungle, as they could not walk any further. At night, we had to make fences with bamboo cut from the forest and sleep inside the fence. The soldiers slept around us.

I also saw some soldiers who were really tired. I saw one soldier who loaded his gun to commit suicide, but others grabbed his rifle, and then he was tied up and beaten. I also saw some stronger soldiers hit and kicked the weaker soldiers when they were unable to walk. I heard them whisper to each other that some soldiers were fleeing along the way.

After we arrived in Htee Hta village, we were not released. They ordered us to dismantle the roofing on deserted houses and build new shelters. They fed us two cups of rice a day, with salt, and sometimes banana palm shoots. The soldiers had enough rice, curry and canned food. We porters slept in a shelter we built ourselves. The roof was made of old iron sheets. When it rained, the roof did not cover us, so we slept soaked. There were so many sick porters among us. The military didn’t care for the sick.

From Htee Hta, we had to carry things downstream again. We arrived in Maw Hta, and spent one night there. In the morning, we headed into the jungle. After two days, I became too weak to carry my load so I requested they reduce the weight I was carrying, but in vain. I decided to flee whenever the opportunity allowed. One night when the troops were on the top of a hill, me and two other porters, Sein Min Oo and Ko Aung Soe, sneaked out. Though we didn't know where to go, we only thought it necessary to escape. We walked down a stream and arrived at the Tenasserim River, where we saw two women. We requested they ferry us to the other side of the river with their boat. After we arrived on the other side, we walked downstream and later saw two other villagers, who fed us. After we finished our meal, these two villagers sent us to a KNU officer. By the time I arrived there, I could not breathe or cough hard, because of chest pains. The KNU soldiers gave me some medicine. We ate well and regained our health, strength and weight. Now I want to go back to my home, as I've left my children and wife without any money.

Source: KNU Mergui-Tavoy Information Office, Update Situation Report, 27 August 1998


Return to Top 16. No rest for the farmers Next

U Nyunt, a middle aged man from Thayet Chaung Township, Tenasserim Division, speaking in June 1998.

I’ve come to the border to sell my cattle. I’ve come every year for the last five years. The reason is that I’ve had no money to grow paddy, so every year I’ve come to sell some cattle to get money. This time, I sold three cows for 10,000 Thai baht. If you change that to kyat it’s about 80,000. I have six acres of fields at my village. That land doesn’t yield too much paddy. If you use fertilizer then one acre can yield 60-70 baskets. If you don’t use it then it’s only 30-40. Last year, for six acres I got a total of 350 baskets. I used 14 bags of fertilizer. One bag of fertilizer was 3000 kyat, so for six acres it cost 42,000 kyat. I hired a plowing machine for 3000 kyat per acre. You also have to give money to hire people to transplant seedlings and harvest, so for my six acres I had 80-100,000 kyat total expenses. The amount that I got by selling my three cows now will be completely used for this year's harvest expenses.

We give 6–8 baskets per acre paddy quota, as our yield is low. For my six acres I give 48 baskets. Last year, we got 190 kyat per basket from the government. At first, we had heard that they would pay real market value, but later we only got 190 kyat. At that time, the market price was 350-400 kyat per basket. Farmers with more than three acres are given loans from the government at the rate of 1000 kyat per acre. That commits us to giving them the paddy quota. We have to take the quota paddy to a storage facility about 10 miles from our village. For people with carts and bullocks, it’s no problem, but for people without, they have to rent them from others. For the trip of 10 miles, the rent is two baskets of paddy.

Traditionally, in the monsoon we worked paddy, and in the summer worked vegetable gardens. From 1992 to the present, the agricultural corporation officials introduced a program to increase paddy yields. You have to crop exactly according to their method. For 6 years we have done like this. Our village has low quality soil, so unlike some other places we don’t get too much paddy. The villagers lose all of their money because after working the monsoon crop we have to do the summer crop. The summer crop is a total loss for farmers, but if you don’t do it, the government will take away your land. So, we lose our money, but anyway, we grow it. To grow the summer crop, each year the stream must be dammed and an irrigation system built. The construction of this must be done by the villagers as "people’s contributions." We do this work for a month at the start of every summer, so the farmers get no rest.

Our village has more than 400 houses. There’s an army post. Ten soldiers from IB 404 stay there. Every house must give 500 kyat per month as porter fees to the village council. Also, four porters are called and rotated monthly. Villagers who don’t want to go must hire other people to go, and for one month that’s 60,000 kyat. Every day, two other people have to stay as "standby" porters for the soldiers in the village. To hire another person for this duty is 300 kyat per day. If you kill a pig or cow to sell, you must give 10% as "flesh tax" to the soldiers. Sometimes they kill people’s chickens or ducks in front of the villagers, but nobody dares to say anything back to them.


Return to Top 17. Everything left behind Next

Kyan Pyu, a 52 year old father of six of Palaw Township, Tenasserim Division, speaking in the jungle in May 1998.

Forced labor has been demanded by the soldiers since they established a base close to our village in 1989. I was forced to labor several times. The common laboring duties are building outposts, sharpening spikes, sentry duties, digging trenches and carrying building materials. Those refusing orders were given a penalty of 3-4 days digging trenches at the army base.

The Burma army troops ordered our village relocate to Palawgon twice. Initially in 1996, while the villagers were harvesting, and the second time, also in the harvesting period of 1998. I heard that people at the Palawgon relocation site could not work for themselves. Besides paying for basic foods, they also had to buy fuel and even drinking water. Fearing military persecution, my family and I did not move to the relocation site. We and some others fled to the jungle about two hours by foot from our village. Nine families left with us. Many of the villagers fled, scattering across upper streams.

We live in fear of the Burma army. They searched for our hiding places four times this year. If they find us, they will shoot or capture us. They caught one of my daughters. I heard that she was imprisoned and is alive. The fourth time, the soldiers killed six villagers in our area. This year we have changed our hiding place all four times. Each time one of us is caught, we have to change our hideout for fear that the one arrested will become a guide for the soldiers. Each time the soldiers find people, they use them as guides to find other hiding places.

I have left nearly all of my property. I left my plantation, my house, all of my livestock. My betel plantation yielded 100,000 kyat of produce each year. But I had to leave it all. I learned that my house has been burned down by the military. The house was worth about 150,000 kyat. I could carry nothing. I left everything behind. Before, I could make ends meet, but now I am without income.

Here in the hideout, my greatest fear is of the soldiers. I am always worrying they might come. Other problems we face are sickness and the difficulty of finding medicine. The second greatest problem is food. Salt and fish paste are rare commodities. We need money to buy food, but now we do not have incomes as we did in our villages. Also, we can only buy these goods at villages controlled by the army. We dare not travel to buy goods at these villages. They are quite far and we fear the soldiers will capture us. Rice is a problem only if the soldiers find and destroy it.


Return to Top 18. Anti-insurgency and food scarcity Next

Saw Eh Doh War, a 27 year old farmer from Kyauktaga Township, Pegu Division, speaking in June 1997.

My village is in a front-line area. Innocent villagers have often been killed in battles. In 1994, the Burma army forcibly relocated a lot of villages to Taw Katah military camp on the Shwe Kabin-Kyauk Kyi road. Their strategy is to deny the KNU shelter and food supplies. The actual result is that the people have had to face food scarcity. To go back to their farmlands, people have to get permission from the army authorities. Usually approval is granted for between one and seven people from a village to return for up to seven days. It is generally a couple of hours traveling time from the relocation sites back to the old village areas. But tilling of land relies on weather conditions, and so this also makes problems. Often the time period given by the authorities for the farmers to do their work is simply not long enough or the conditions are not suitable at the time for the villagers to do their farm work, so there has been a sharp decrease in the production of paddy.

The villagers are also conscripted as porters. Three to five young male villagers have to be on stand-by in each camp at all times. The purpose is also to have the able-bodied young men under their watch, so their contacts with the KNU will be severed. The parents of those men have to send them meals daily. Villages which have not yet been relocated have to pay various taxes, such as porter and sentry fees, and special taxes twice per month of 100-200 kyat per time. All the people's earnings are going to the military government. This is also a part of their strategy- the villagers must use all their grain stocks simply in order to survive.

Paddy stocks from Sa Pyin Gyi, Hta Htu, Paw Thayay, Teik Pauk, Oh Myay Do, Patala, Kywe Gyo Inn, Noh Po and Kya Inn villages are being stock-piled at Hta Htu and Kywe Talin military camps. The soldiers ration the paddy back to the villagers. Villagers have to go and present passes to withdraw their food quotas. During the rainy season, floods made it difficult for people to go and draw rations, so people were going hungry. The soldiers also sell the paddy to traders instead of redistributing it to the villagers.


Return to Top 19. The social costs of government policy Next

A 25 year old farmer from Kyauktaga Township, Pegu Division, speaking in June 1997.

Half of the people in our village are farmers. It is the traditional occupation. Under the current government, some are turning their backs on farming and looking for other ways to earn their livings.

Taxes and quotas on farm produce have been rapidly increased under this government. As a family of eleven people, we need 400 baskets of paddy for our annual consumption. Our farm of 10 acres yields about 60 baskets of paddy per acre. But after the quota and taxes and other costs, we don’t have enough. So we have had to plant summer crops, such as peanuts and beans, to make up for the loss. Besides that, when the sale of paddy was 50 kyat for one basket on the open market, the government gave only 15. When it was 100 kyat per basket, they gave only 40. There have been such rapid rates of inflation on basic goods like rice and beans, but not wages. Consequently, a range of social problems have arisen out of increasing poverty, such as theft of rice and other possessions. The government ignores these problems stemming from its policies.

The majority of villagers are trying to till lands handed down through their families over generations, and they are clinging to them by selling cattle and parts of the land to meet costs. They are desperate to prevent their lands from being confiscated by the government. Farmers have no skills they can apply to trades other than their own.

The government lacks the know-how, machinery and support to build the agricultural base. Large areas of land have been destroyed by flooding, but in spite of lost agricultural output, the government doesn’t lessen the quotas they demand be sold to them.


Return to Top 20. Taxation, relocation, starvation Next

Saw War a 28 year old man from Kyauk Kyi Township, Pegu Division, speaking in May 1997.

I know some people in my area are now forced to eat rice porridge, and some have sought help from friends. I know this because I work together with one of the elders of my village who was feeding people coming to seek his help. These things go on all the time, but especially when military operations occur during the hot season. Most of the people who are starving are daily-wage earners, who get around 80 kyat per day, and tenant farmers. I know that starvation is occurring as a result of all varieties of taxation, forced labor, forced relocation and military operations.

In our area we produce one annual crop. With fertilizer we can get a good crop of about 80 baskets per acre. Land tenants then have to repay around 25 baskets per acre to the land owner, and hire a pair of cattle at 50 baskets per bull, to plow the fields. The government quota is 15 baskets per acre. That leaves a farmer working five or six acres with less than half of the crop to sell.

People are called to serve five-day and seven-day rotations as porters, and the soldiers also arbitrarily detain people to work for them. These are not the same as "voluntary" labor which is mostly on roads and other constructions. Long term labor is the worst. It's not for one day, one week or one month- you just disappear and that's that. You don't get told anything about what’s planned for you. To get exempted you have to pay from 100 kyat for a day to 5000 kyat for long-term duties. One house usually is called upon for labor three or four times per year. To exempt a village from relocation costs 30,000 kyat. Some villages have been ordered to move twice in one year.


Return to Top 21. A farmer’s lot Next

A 53 year old father of five in Thayawaddy Township, Pegu Division, speaking in June 1997.

The price of paddy is currently on the rise. One hundred baskets wholesale for 32,500 kyat. The government quota is 12 baskets per acre. They give 160 kyat per basket. But when the paddy is weighed by government agents we have to add five to ten baskets for every one hundred baskets delivered- we always take along surplus. We give one hundred, but they always find ways to cut it back. They always do things like that to us. They claim there is trash among the paddy. They make deductions called "donations." They draw up registers and promise to provide one bag of discounted fertilizer per acre of farmland, but give nothing.

Our farms can yield up to 70 baskets of paddy per acre. My 17 acres can yield nearly 1000 baskets. But after we've given our quota and deducted planting and harvesting expenses we are left with an amount barely sufficient to cover our basic food expenses. In the past we didn't use much fertilizer, so our production level was less- only up to 50 baskets per acre. At that time, though, the cost of living was lower, so we could get by. But by 1985-86, under the previous socialist regime, the situation was deteriorating. We couldn't sell any of our paddy on the open market at that time- it all went to the government. The farmers could hardly keep enough of their crop for household consumption. In the present conditions we are free to sell part of our crop on the open market, but the expenses involved in planting, harvesting, labor and so on are escalating right out of proportion. Food and commodities prices are also on the rise. So you can see that the farmer’s lot is still unenviable. It has only become worse and worse.


Return to Top 22. A landless worker Next

Chit Tin, a 25 year old father from Bilin Township, Mon State, speaking in July 1997.

My parents are wage earners, as our family has no land of our own. Starting from when I was 16 until 24, I too worked on a farm. Now I have left. Working as a farm laborer I received 10 baskets of polished grain for a season's work- farmers hired me to help them plant and maintain crops. I had to feed seven people. Our daily consumption was 1 pyi of rice, small quantities of fish paste; chilies; Ajinomoto and vegetables foraged for in the forest. If my younger brothers did not attend school, they could also catch some fish. My parents are aged, so it is difficult for them to work, apart from foraging for vegetables. My two younger brothers we were trying to keep in school, but now they have to support our parents. Sometimes we had absolutely no more rice left and then we had to go and seek some from other villagers, such as farmers whom I worked for. At these times, my father would also work. We would borrow enough rice to keep us going for one or two months. But sometimes after working to get rice, I had to give it back to people whom I had borrowed it from and so then we no longer had enough left to eat ourselves, and had to borrow it again. Generally, we had to beg for rice like this at least once a year, usually not long before the new harvest was in.

Our family didn't want to come to this refugee camp. But because land holders have become totally discouraged they don’t want to do the work anymore. In our area land is not yet organized by title- people simply clear land for use. What prevented me from doing that was the need for capital items, such as tools and cattle to plow the land, and a stock of seeds to sow. None of these do we poor people have available to us, nor is there any way for us to get such items without too much expense. It is easier to work on someone else's land.

In 1990, the Burma army arrived in our region. Other villagers fled, but I was not aware of the arrival, as I was off working. They captured me and forced me to work as a porter for more than 2 months, carting ammunitions up the one hill three or four times per day. They fed me only once per day. It wasn't long after I was released that they began relocating villages on three-day notices.

They started relocations again in 1996, to an army camp. They try to control the population by keeping them close by. In recent times there have been three relocations, around March-April of each year. To leave the relocation site, such as to go work in the fields, you have to get a pass from the village chairman, and return the same day- the hours of the pass are 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Outside these times, the soldiers threaten to shoot anybody they see on sight. Most farmers' properties are at least two hours walk from the relocation site, and so they have a maximum of 6 hours work time available per day. There is no longer any benefit in doing work. So the land holders are no longer working their fields and this also created a big problem for me. Although I might have been able to find some other work, it is very difficult to earn a living now, and we live in constant fear of the military. We had no choice left but to come to this refugee camp.

Between February and May, the roads are open to vehicles, and so the military sends enough supplies to last for the rainy season, when conditions aren't good for transporting large quantities of food. First, the soldiers resell the supplies they get. This happens in two ways. Individual soldiers sell their personal supplies to supplement their incomes. In particular, they sell beans and condensed milk. But sometimes they also sell their rice, particularly if it is poor quality. The other thing that happens is that the battalion commanding officer sells bulk provisions for personal profit, especially the stocks of rice. Most rice is sold by the commander, not the soldiers themselves. Generally, the village head acts as a broker. Most buyers are traders from other places. The traders bring in basic commodities for sale, like salt, fish paste, chilies and Ajinomoto, and if they are making a profit then they purchase the soldiers' provisions. The effect of all this, however, is that by the time the rains have set in and the roads are no longer open, the soldiers don’t have sufficient provisions left for themselves, and they demand rice from villagers. They demand rice weekly for the duration of the rainy season and quantities vary from one can to one pyi per house, depending upon the needs of the soldiers and the size of the household. Come the next dry season, and it starts all over again. Although quite a number of units have been rotated through this garrison, it seems customary for each to behave in this manner.


Return to Top 23. Forced relocation Next

A 26 year old female teacher from Bilin Township, Mon State.

My village is in the plains, and there are also hills around the area. Villagers are paddy and swidden farmers. Typically, villages in this area had 20 to 30 houses each. My village stayed in the same place for a long time, but starting from December 1995, after the crops had been harvested, the Burma army soldiers gave villagers two day notices to relocate to Kwee Lay village. People were too afraid not to go. These relocations were part of the Four Cuts operation. Due to this relocation program, food has become increasingly scarce. Prior to relocations, Kwee Lay had about 50 houses. At present it has more than 300.

After people relocated, they thought that they would stay for a short time, and then go and stay back in their original places, so they didn't bring all of their possessions, but instead hid them around the place. One villager explained to me how he had hidden possessions in the river bank. Some soldiers went to catch fish and saw the villagers' possessions, so they took them. This villager lost a lot of household items.

Most of the villagers are animists or Buddhists, and they have a lot of religious observances regarding agriculture. For example, if fields are damaged prior to the appropriate date when they must be prepared, then the people will no longer use them. In 1995, four villages were ordered to relocate to Kwee Lay, being K'wah Htah, Lah Kyoe Khoh, Su Khi, and Ta Meh Khi. Many people failed to relocate as they were instructed, so the Burma army came and burned their lands. For the rest of that year, they ceased their work and refused to grow rice. Although they had rice left over, they had to give it to the Burma army, KNU and DKBA.

The village was taxed by KNU for a long time, though there were some benefits such as schools and clinics. When the Burma army came, it also made demands, but if fields were not destroyed, then we could pay. But with the advent of the DKBA in 1996, food problems have grown. Starvation has started as a result of the relocations. The area is being watched intently by the Burma army and DKBA, so if people want to go out of the village to their fields then they have to get a pass and cannot stay out for a long time. Passes are issued daily for 5 kyat each, allowing travel from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. People cannot carry rice out of the village or they are accused of taking it to the KNU. One person told me that if he walked very quickly, then he could reach his farm, strip three betel palms of their fruit, and bring it back to Kwee Lay for sale. Most relocated villagers have to travel two to three hours to work their farms. As they have to travel back and forth like this all the time, they are also unable to look after their crops very well. The crops become damaged by diseases, insects and weather, so there is no longer any benefit in doing the work. The crops are also damaged by the movements of soldiers from one place to the next. Another thing is that few of the farmers are paddy farmers, most are swidden farmers. Swidden crops need the land to lie fallow before being used again, but due to relocations more and more people are being forced into a small area, so the land is becoming crowded and the quality of the soil is deteriorating rapidly. Also, when the rice crop is almost due, they still have to give taxes or food to the Burma army and DKBA soldiers in ever increasing quantities, and so they experience hunger. At that time of year most people are not eating regular meals of rice, but are eating rice porridge, perhaps only once per day, with a few bamboo shoots. Parents often go hungry to feed their children.

In March 1997, children in Kwee Lay were dying virtually daily, due to basic illnesses and inadequate care. At least twenty children died in one month. A lot of new people were coming into Kwee Lay, but had to go back to work their original properties daily, so they had insufficient time left to take care of their children. They have had to work harder than ever before, and even all the youth are also working. The youngest are left behind, by themselves, in unsanitary conditions. Many get measles and dysentery. Their diseases are treatable, but there are no medicines, and many end up dying.

Due to soldiers’ activities or difficulties in getting to their farms, people are no longer working their lands. So there is no longer enough food left to eat. Villagers are facing starvation and disease. They can't contemplate their futures. Some who have no money and no more rice go to those with rice and do domestic work at their houses to get food to eat, meal by meal. The house owners are very embarrassed and sympathetic, but the people who come to do the work are no longer thinking of anything except how to get a small amount of food to fill their stomachs, which will satisfy their immediate needs.

As I see it, the village is in serious decline. The villagers are totally discouraged, and some want to leave their lands for good and find other work, but as they have never left their area or done any other kind of work, they can't think of where they would go or what they would do. The food that they grow, they don't get to eat. They have to give taxes and meet demands from three sides. Even if they have only rice porridge to eat, they still aren't too discouraged, but now some can't even eat rice porridge any more- sometimes they just eat roots and leaves. Some villagers told me, "If we could go to Thailand easily then we would all desire to go, but we don't want to give up our homelands here to other people."


Return to Top 24. The reality of agricultural development Next

Myint Soe, a 34 year old laborer from Thaton Township, Mon State.

This is a general description of my village since 1988, but things have been worse since 1996 than any time before. The village has only about 18 real landowners, and the rest are hired workers. The biggest farm is 50 acres. I worked on a 13 acre holding, which yielded 60-70 baskets of rice per acre, as long as we used fertilizer.

High taxes and hunger forced some farmers to sell their land. They have to pay the annual quota, which the government buys at 150 kyat per basket. The administration had us build a big dam, and to support this work farm owners paid one more basket per acre annually to the township council. The dam construction began in 1992 and took two years. The water is for the dry season crop. The dam needs maintenance, and if you don’t go you are fined 100 kyat per day.

The Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation sells two kinds of fertilizer which farmers can buy on credit at 3,200 kyat per acre. But our township council prefers selling to merchants, leaving farmers with only 4 bags for 10 acres. But when the debts are due, farm owners have to pay the full value, as if they had actually received 2 bags per acre. We heard that the government sent irrigation pumps, but after the township council received them all the pumps disappeared.

Villagers build roads without pay. If you don't go, the soldiers make you a porter to the frontline. IB 33 Commander Aung Ye Min established a rubber plantation on 500 acres near the village. The army made people plant trees then fence in the plantation. Cattle used to graze there, and now if they stray back the soldiers shoot and eat them.

Taxes and oppression are starving the village. There’s no time to work, only to pay taxes and do forced labor; many villagers have little food. Some must eat porridge, some only water skimmed off boiled rice, and others only sweet potatoes. To feed the children some adults go without food for one or two days at a time. Even so, children increasingly suffer diarrhea, sore stomachs, and death.

I have 5 children. My oldest daughter, who is eleven, always went to do forced labor while we parents looked for food. You see children 8 or 9 years old working. Sometimes we only had enough rice for porridge. I worked all day, then went home only to hear my children cry from hunger. My tears fell, too. I could not suffer the poverty of my village. I came to Thailand to work and send money home, so that they can eat.


Return to Top 25. Separation for survival Next

Ma Khin, a 30 year old mother from Thaton Township, Mon State, speaking in May 1997.

Previously my family had seven and a half acres of our own land, however, we had to give a quota of 14 baskets paddy grain per acre annually. Our land yielded only about 300 baskets per year. We were forced to sell the land to a wealthy person for only 30,000 kyat. We used this money across six years, while doing labor on other farms, but now it’s all gone. Now, one acre of land in my village can fetch more than 20,000 kyat.

Of my five children, three have had to leave home and work elsewhere. The oldest is 17. My husband got work as a subsistence wage laborer, digging earth to the west of Mayankun. He could earn 50-150 kyat per day, depending on the amount dug, but it was still not enough to support our family. Also, the army is constructing a cement road between Mayankun and Kyeh Kaung villages, and are demanding laborers or a fee of 100 kyat per person per day.

As a result of these problems in getting enough food for our family, we have had to separate. The children have gone to do domestic work in other houses. We parents came to work in Thailand. We figured that we could get better wages than in Burma, but after we came we were split up by agents and I was sent to a rich person who clearly planned to sell me. I and my friend fled secretly, and will now return to Burma.


Return to Top 26. Food scarcity in the delta Next

Kyaw Aye, a 40 year old fisherman from Ngaputaw Township, Irrawaddy Division.

I once stayed in my wife’s village and worked as a logger, but with increasing restrictions and demands by various authorities, it was becoming more and more difficult to earn a living this way. In 1994 I told my wife, "I can’t stay here and do this work any more- if we don’t leave, we’ll starve." I left the village and went to stay in town with family members. It was better to go to an urban area. Life is easier for the people there than in rural areas. I was lucky to have family in town. If a rural person tries to move into town without having any connections, it is very difficult to get started.

Since I stayed in town, I became a fisherman. During peak season I can make about 1,000 kyat per week. During the other times of year I also repair bicycles. The income from this activity is pretty inconsistent- sometimes quite good, sometimes nothing. People simply can’t support a family on one form of income- you have to try your best to find as many different ways to get money as possible.

In 1993 three children died a couple of doors down from my house. All boys, they were around 10, 8 and 6. The children had always been weak and malnourished, especially in the last couple of years. Their bellies were distended and their ribs stuck out—like starving African children we saw in magazines. Their knees were swollen and their calves were sticks. Their skin was white, their lips pale. They often had diarrhea. Their father worked cutting grass and bamboo to build houses. They all died about a week apart—I remember because I went to cut timber for a week, came back and heard one had died. I went back to the forest, came home the next week and another was gone. Just one week later the third child died. We knew the family well. I remember the family’s condition and how this all came to pass.

Their father used to grow bananas, cucumbers, and watermelons on a small plot about two miles outside the village. After the 1988 uprising, the government consolidated the village, so the family had to move. Wild elephants ate all their plants, and so he turned to cutting bamboo. He earned about eighty kyat per day, which might have been enough, but he only got cash when bamboo traders came, so the family sometimes went hungry. Also, at 45 he was getting arthritis and couldn’t work every day. His family of seven ate no more than mine of five, and my children were younger. They begged for help frequently. Of course, we pitied them and helped as we could. Apart from rice, my wife gave them salt and fish paste.

When the children got diarrhea nobody suspected anything serious. They took some Burmese medicine, but that didn’t stop it. Intravenous drips might have helped, but those cost 150 kyat or so, and nobody could afford them. So they passed away. The parents knew their children were dying, but there was no health care or medicine. Their father could only weep, heartbroken.

I knew this was a wrong and terrible thing. In my opinion, these children died from starvation. If they had adequate food they wouldn’t have died. And they weren’t the only ones, but I don’t know the others’ details. In nearby villages there was a minor epidemic. No matter how deep in poverty, people are never excused from demands for labor and money. This family had no alternative but to struggle for survival every day, and so the children died.

The annual inflation rate on basic food items in the last few years has been about 25%. Before 1988, we didn’t see price increases like that. If my family runs short of food then I simply have to work extra-hard, and other members of my family will try to find some way of getting a little extra income, such as buying big bunches of vegetables, splitting them up and reselling them in one kyat bundles. Everybody does like this.

Every year people are called up to do labor on roads. This was another thing that seriously affected my ability to earn an income in my wife’s village. Previously, I had to go twice, for an entire month. Orders came down from the township council through the village head. In my house there was but my wife and daughters and myself, so who else would go? The government was making these roads to connect with an artery from Pathein to Ngaputaw, but until now no vehicles are allowed on these roads as they are unpaved and would be destroyed in the wet season. If you chose not to go to labor then you could find somebody willing and negotiate a price for them to take your place, usually around 1000 kyat. I didn’t have any savings to do like this. In fact, when I went to the road works I had only about 60-70 kyat with me.

A lot of people at the construction site got headaches and fevers. As far as I see it, it should have been the responsibility of officials making us do the work to provide medicines for those who got ill, but they didn’t give a thing. We also had to take all of our own tools- we got no support from the government for any of the work. We constructed huts in the fields that the road was constructed across. The farmers who lost land naturally got no compensation. One road also cut through a cemetery, but never mind about that! Women from a local village sold small quantities of food daily, but people in my group didn’t have money. We mixed rice, fish paste, salt and turmeric together and just ate that. Of course, we were usually weak and sickly, as we were doing hard work but eating poor food. While I was absent, my family survived on about 900 kyat a month. My wife collected fire wood and cut bamboo which she resold to traders on the riverside, earning about 10 kyat per day.

It’s a lot easier to stay in an urban area than in a small rural village. Since I’ve stayed in town, I’ve never had to go and work like the villagers are called up to do. If a young or middle aged man stays in a rural village, then any demand falls on your head, as there’s few people. This was increasingly the case when I stayed in my wife’s village, so I told her "let’s move to the town." I remember that at that time we had little food left, and my clothes were ragged, but when you don’t have enough food you don’t think about buying new clothes.

In my wife’s village of about 100 houses, I would say that around 90 households are living in poverty. But poverty has different levels of severity. What generally prevents people from improving their incomes is that they have no money to get some capital items to do more lucrative work. This is a big difference between people like myself who are able to survive reasonably well and those who are struggling to fill their stomachs every day. For example, nearly everybody in my wife’s village had the ability to do logging work like I was, but they needed the money to buy a saw, which cost about 1500 kyat a few years ago, and they simply don’t have any money. It’s not that they can’t do the work.

In my opinion there are definitely serious food shortages among the rural poor. I would say that 60-70% of the villagers face the threat of hunger on a daily basis. Every day the only foods that people ever eat are rice, fish paste and leaves. For a lot of them, to have their income generation interrupted for even one day means that they have no food. Some have single sets of clothes and no blankets, or only the most threadbare ones.

In the towns there’s still a lot of poverty, but it’s not so bad as the rural communities. I would put the urban poor at 60-70 % of the population. In town, the wealthy are traders, video hall owners, loan sharks and so on. I would say that 30 to 40% of the urban population have food problems daily. Mostly, these are farm laborers or petty traders of vegetables and so on. A lot of them are migrants from the rural areas trying to escape the same kinds of problems in their home villages. Between those who are getting by and those who are not, it’s again a matter of having some materials or equipment on which to base your income. For example, a porter who carries stuff off boats can get up to 100 kyat per day, but somebody with a bicycle-sidecar can get 200-300 kyat per day.

Poverty has certainly been on a steady increase, it has never dropped. Since 1988, prices have risen to four to eight times what they were back then, which is especially shocking to our people who were previously used to stable prices. Just once around 1984-85 there was a really big increase in the cost of rice. It was prior to the new crop. Overnight the price jumped from 40 to 800 kyat for one basket and stayed like that for a couple of months until the new crop was in, when it fell back to 70-80 kyat. For two or three months people were eating only one meal of rice porridge with some leaves per day. I’m not sure exactly why it happened, but I heard that the BSPP government had been taking very high quotas and this led to shortages. I don’t know really what they were doing with all that rice and how they worked things out.

Poverty increases problems among people, especially in towns. In villages, people are still tight-knit and try to face their difficulties without undermining each other, but in towns that’s not so. People bring everything into their houses before nightfall, so that it won’t be stolen. Chickens are often thieved. I lost a whole melon vine one time- somebody just came and ripped the whole lot up from along side the house during the night. Unfortunately, it’s not so easy to bring plants in!

People lose their lives working for the army without receiving a salary and then their families get no compensation. Health is bad, but there are no decent clinics, so people die who shouldn't have to. School children lack materials and struggle amid poverty. As we are all suffering from the military government's oppression we must join hands to overthrow them. It is clear that the people have the right to take this course of action.

The following is additional material received from this source as of December 1998. It highlights the worsening food-crisis in the Irrawaddy Division.

Since last year, the cost of almost all foodstuffs and basic goods in the delta have doubled. In August 1998, I met with a corporal from IB 93. I didn't ask him anything, but of his own accord he complained about the rations received by his battalion. They are still receiving 6 pyi of rice per month, but all of the surplus items- oil, salt, sugar, condensed milk, beans, fish paste- are being rationed at only half of the previous level.

To get extra money, soldiers in the delta go out on "conscription" drives. They go to the village/ward council officers, inform them they want to conscript one or two people, and tell them how much it will cost to opt out. They don't make the cash amount too high, and right now nobody wants to become a soldier, as their conditions aren't as good as before, so the soldiers know that people will pay the money. The money is split between the soldier collecting it and his superiors.

Fishing is not as good as before, as there is little water in tributaries. This in spite of good rains in 1997-98. There is heavy deforestation in the delta, and also intensive irrigation. Wells are increasingly empty too. In the past, people were happy to let neighbors share water from wells, but in this last year, families were reserving their wells for their own use only, and even then some don't have enough.

In June-July 1998, there was a lot of rain and many children died from dengue fever. Adults also suffered the disease, but didn't die. Every day children came into the town hospital and two to three per day were dying for a period of some weeks. In one case on July 26, a father paid 2000 kyat for a boat to bring his child to the hospital, and then the doctor told him it was too late, and refused to treat the child. The father told him, "Whether too late or not, give the medicine!" and was ready to pay for it. But the doctor refused, and shortly after the child died. The father in a fury swore and abused the doctor and hospital staff. For those children who survived, it took 2-3 weeks in hospital to recover, which cost parents more than 20,000 kyat. At the hospital, absolutely everything must be purchased and paid for.

Now, a large number of children are forced to drop out of school after Standard 2 or 3. A member of my family works at a school where most of the children attending are particularly poor. At that school, the children who attend often come with no food for the day, no shoes, etc. The school materials are also all insufficient.

In July 1998, I met with a schoolteacher. The teacher was pushing a bicycle loaded with dried goods, basic household items, etc. He explained to me that he and his sister are both primary school teachers, and must take the main responsibility to support their family of 6. The 1200 kyat salary is not enough, but also they are not given permission to resign their positions and find other work. Therefore, to survive he goes to buy small goods in town and resells them in his village, a couple of times per week. It takes about one and a half hours traveling time on the bicycle each time. Most teachers must find extra sources of income like this to survive. While teachers, like other civil servants, continue to receive 6 pyi of discounted rice at about 30 kyat per pyi each month, it is generally poor quality, and sometimes rotten. Some resell it, some re-polish it.

In my opinion, the main issue in the last year has been the price of food- it's doubled, but wages are unchanged. As a result of this, regular people are slowly understanding more about how this government is no good for them. They see that the authorities are only working for themselves and the country. People have stronger political ideas than before, mainly rooted in the economic difficulties of the present. More and more people consciously recognize that they are poor due to the bad government. There is more cautious resistance than before, both out of the need to survive and out of resentment to the administration. For example, 5-6 years ago, farmers absolutely had to give the paddy quota that was set, whatever the case. Nowadays, they try to find ways not to give full amounts, and the government is more cautious. Traders recognize that taxes are high and there are a lot of problems for them under the regime. They think that if there was "democracy" then economic conditions would improve. In fact, most people equate democracy with better economic circumstances.


Return to Top 27. A teacher’s lament Next

A 35 year old woman from Pyapon Township, Irrawaddy Division, speaking in June 1997.

Due to the high cost of living, government wages are not sufficient to make ends meet. I receive a salary of only 900 kyat per month. At present, we have a monthly deduction of 500 kyat for the loans given last year. We then use 280 kyat to buy 14 pyi of rice and by the time all other deductions for teachers welfare funds and the like are made there's only about 80 kyat left. In residential areas there are further collections for construction of roads, receptions for officers and other compulsory donations that all add to the burden of poor workers. Those contributions amount to at least another 50 to 100 kyat per month. On top of all these, there are weekly work teams organized to clean the ward. If we can't send someone to join the team it's 30 kyat per household. Road repair work is required twice per year. We have to take our own food and tools. That work lasts for three days to one week each time. If we cannot attend then we have to find a substitute or pay a fine directly. The fine is up to 1000 kyat. When we tell them that we are government employees, the authorities turn a deaf ear to our complaints. We all have to do the same work.

Eight years ago, we got 450 kyat a month. At that time we used about 100 kyat for our 14 pyi of discounted rice. Although we had to make a contribution to the welfare fund, we still had about 300 kyat left. Five members of a household could basically live on 8 kyat per day, for oil, salt, chilies, onions and a few vegetables. At that time a viss of onions was only about 8 kyat, and pork 25-30 kyat. Now a viss of pork is 220-250 kyat. The costs of foodstuffs have risen 9-10 times since then. Our pay has only doubled. Given our current incomes, workers are doomed to starve, or work up debts. To survive I give private tuition to 15 students at my home, for one hour each morning and again each evening. I charge 50 kyat per month, per student. That's enough to cover basic expenses for oil, salt and so on.

Food and commodity prices are rising daily. I have thought about leaving my teaching position, as I feel very frustrated. On second thoughts, I realize that I would have no money. If I resign my job, I would also have to explain why I want to leave. It is a very complicated process and I would be subjected to suspicion and interrogation. My husband was previously also a government employee. Now he has a job as a watchman at a commercial firm. We are lucky that he has been able to send some money to us, otherwise we would be in deep trouble.

Some public servants cannot afford to keep their children in school. Once they are old enough, they have to join their parents in working for the household. When we think about our education, we realize that even university graduates have a hope of only becoming government employees, which would not do anything to improve one's life. To make money is the overwhelming solution to our problems.


Return to Top 28. The summer paddy program Next

Kyaw Win, a 30 year old male farmer from Pyapon Township, Irrawaddy Division, speaking in June 1997.

I farm six acres, and give a quota of 11 baskets paddy per acre. I would like to try the summer crop, but I am unable to irrigate. Farmers close to the roads are required to cultivate summer paddy without fail. In some areas, once the directive was given to start the summer cultivation, farmers were forced to harvest unripe monsoon paddy crops. Some who had planted soya beans after the first crop had to destroy or uproot the plants to start the summer paddy on orders from the township council. Then, due to poor irrigation, crops failed and many farmers had to face severe losses and bankruptcy.

The lower level administrators, seeking only to satisfy their superiors, demanded that villagers cultivate summer paddy along the whole length of both sides of roads. I’m lucky, because my farm is quite a distance from any road. I made a cover-up by cultivating a small plot of land in accordance with their demands. I sowed the seeds for the administrators to see, and the paddy sprouted. The local officials who came were taken in. Later, due to the lack of water supply, the plants shriveled and died.

A lot of farmers have to play along to make things easier for themselves. They pretend obedience. If there is a plot of land available for summer cultivation and there are people who want to use it, then it must be given up. A lot of people only contributed half of their quotas on monsoon paddy. I too have contributed only half. We have been pressed many times by council officials to complete our contributions. We tell them that we will supplement what we've given and after they go away at least we're left in peace for a while. In the last couple of years, there were arrests and detentions. People had to sell their cattle to pay fines and get relatives released. This year there haven't been any arrests. However, owners of land who failed to meet their quotas for last year are being required to pay a 1000 kyat fine per acre before they begin re-cultivating their fields.

As the government didn't get full quotas, the rice mills have been closed down to prevent farmers from secretly milling withheld grain. Those who are determined to mill their paddy have to bribe police between 100 and 200 kyat. The police get their cut and the farmers get their paddy nicely milled. The policemen too have insufficient incomes upon which to live. But when the district or township council officials approach then the mills have to stop functioning. The authorities know what is going on. They have their own corrupt practices and they know all too well about this sort of behavior. This kind of corruption is nothing new. But it's obvious that there's no progress for farmers. We have to tell lies in order to use our own possessions and property. That's the way of life these days.


Return to Top 29. An outspoken elder Next

In January 1997 a meeting was called in Pyapon Township, Irrawaddy Division, to receive instructions from the Agriculture Minister, Lt-Gen Myint Aung. A farmer who attended the meeting gave this account of proceedings:

The government has been giving instructions for the cultivation of summer paddy crops, and have placed district, township and village council officials in charge of implementation. These officials seek only to keep their superiors pleased, by ordering farmers to grow summer crops without fail. As a consequence, farmers who do not have adequate facilities or money for this cultivation have had to face tremendous difficulties. As the farmers are living under a military dictatorship they do not dare to present the unpleasant reality to officials.

On 10 January 1997, the Agriculture Minister was to meet farmers at Ohn Bihn village, Pyapon Township. The township council issued orders that one person from every farming household in the township must attend without fail. The meeting commenced with a speech by the Agriculture Minister, after which members of the audience were invited to submit their views. Two people deliberately selected by local authorities stood up and presented positive views on the summer crop. They didn't present any negative issues. After these two speeches, the minister again called for comments or questions. At that time, a 60 year old farmer took the unprecedented step of standing up and risking arrest in order to outline reality. He spoke as follows:

"Although the summer cultivation scheme will have benefits, it cannot be so in every place and every circumstance. There are three elevations to take into account- high, middle and low lands. This paddy planted on low lands with good access to water sources will succeed, but on middle level lands there will be a lot of difficulties in irrigating, and in spite of high investments by farmers the land will not hold water for long, so ultimately the expense will outweigh the value of the yield. As for the high-level farmlands, summer paddy cultivation will simply not work. Also, most farmers are in poverty, and cannot meet the cost of labor for the scheme. On top of these miseries, the local officials are putting a lot of pressure on us to produce the summer paddy, in spite of how inappropriate it is. Farmers have to bear impossible burdens."

At that point the members of the audience started cheering and clapping, whistling, jumping up and down and making somersaults. Then other farmers were encouraged to speak one by one about their problems and make known the real difficulties they have had to endure. There was constant applause and clamor, the sound of which spread throughout the neighborhood.

After hearing the complaints of the farmers, the general said that he himself had been traveling all over many townships and had repeatedly heard fabricated reports by the township council officials. He then started to remove officials from their positions. He thanked the elderly farmer and those others who had revealed the facts to him. He stated that the dry season crop must only be undertaken in appropriate conditions. He warned local officials not to molest and overburden local farmers. After the meeting closed, people thronged to congratulate the elderly farmer for his outspokenness.


Return to Top 30. No more livelihood Next

This information came from a friend of farmer U Po Gyi’s family in Wakema Township, Irrawaddy Division.

Before 1991, U Po Gyi had 3 acres of land which could yield up to 30 baskets per acre. The government quota was 12 baskets per acre. U Po Gyi also had to put aside six baskets for next years crop, leaving him with a net total of approximately 48 baskets of paddy per year. He also had to hire cattle and farm implements. These expenses didn't leave him with too much, but he could net about 20 baskets of rice per year, enough to survive on.

1991 was a very dry year, although there was still enough water at U Po Gyi's farm for the crop. However due to many insects the crop was halved. In January 1992, village council officials and three police rounded him up with many other farmers who had been unable to give their quotas. They sentenced him to two years in jail, and his family had no way to get him out. In his absence, his wife worked as a subsistence laborer, but in June 1993 she sold their land out of desperation, at 8000 kyat per acre. She used 20,000 kyat to have her husband released. But he was in poor physical condition and died of a heart ailment about 2 months later. That same year, there was a big increase in demand for labor on road constructions. In the absence of his father, U Po Gyi's only son, Maung Ta Ta, who at the time was 15 years old, worked on the Wakema – Shwe Laung road for one month. During that time the boy drank unsanitary water and ate poorly. He contracted dysentery and a fever, and died at the road site.

Since that time, the remaining members of the family, U Po Gyi's wife and four daughters, have had to split up. None of the daughters is in school, and two of them have gone away to find work. Only the mother and youngest daughter are staying together doing daily wage labor to survive.

These kind of events go on all the time. I can give this example because I know the people involved. Others always just look on these situations with pity, and recognize suffering, but don't think that they can do anything about them. They become normal. In Burma, each level of society puts a little more pressure on the next one down, until by the time you get to the very bottom the greatest pressure is there- those people bear everything, that's the result.


Return to Top 31. Death of a child Next

This story of a girl who was four years old at time of her death in Wakema Township, Irrawaddy Division, was told by the same person as the previous testimony.

Naw Paw Wah was the youngest of three children in her family. She died during the rainy season of 1996, as her parents were unable to get enough food and couldn't take good care of her.

When they married in 1981, her parents had two acres of residential land. They sold their land in 1988, in order to do some trade, but after their first child was born, and prices and taxes were rising, they became increasingly poor. Later, her father began to work as a laborer. In 1996, he could earn only 60 kyat per day. But their daily average food expenses were 80 kyat. For typical workers like these, the cost of basic foodstuffs, like oil, onions and beans, are totally unaffordable. If the parents don't work or are sick for one day then they go without food. Their neighbors are all in the same situation, so they are unable to help.

Naw Paw Wah’s mother mostly did odd jobs, like carrying things for people in the marketplace. The children had to be watched by their grandmother during the daytime. She couldn’t take very good care of Naw Paw Wah. The child developed a fever and weakness. The fever continued at a low level for about a month. If the child rested and ate well she could easily survive, but if she felt well then she ran off and played, and then became sick again. Her mother would return to work. After three days of more serious fever, Naw Paw Wah fell unconscious, and her grandmother called her mother to take her to the clinic. Although rushed to the hospital, the child died. The hospital staff said that she was sick due to poor nutrition. She would not have died if her parents had time to take good care of her; if she had enough food for adequate nutrition.


Return to Top 32. A fisherman Next

A crab catcher and fisherman in Bogalay Township, Irrawaddy Division, spoke on conditions there in June 1997.

A lot of people are catching crabs at the moment. Ten years ago very few people were interested in catching crabs- only fish. Now crab catching is on the increase, so brokers and buyers are too. A crab catcher can earn up to 3000 kyat per month. But the rising price of rice doesn't result in improved living conditions.

The Maingma Hla Kyun forest reserve in Bogalay Township is being decimated for firewood. There are streams there where shrimp can be caught, but the license fee costs up to 100,000 kyat. We heard that this license is issued by the People's Pearl and Fisheries Corporation. If they utilized the money they got from licenses on jetty projects and road repairs then the people wouldn't be left bearing such heavy burdens. But now we have to make twice annual financial contributions for road repairs. We have to pay for repairs of bridges, new school buildings, expenses for officials visits, firewood for the military, soldiers meals and everything. All this amounts to about 100 kyat per month per household. If we complain that we lack the money, we are usually told to report to the village council. We can't do that. If we say anything they don't like then we risk detention. So, in spite of our lack of money we do our best.

We're not facing starvation yet, but we have to eat with thrift. Sometimes we have to borrow rice from our neighbors, and later we do them good turns back. We are living "hand to mouth." Having a full sack of rice in reserve is a thing of the past. Fishermen earn our food off the day’s work. Whether or not we get democracy isn't a big issue for us. We just need to do our work in order to survive.


Return to Top 33. A failed irrigation scheme Next

A 58 year old widow from Hlee Ku Township, Rangoon Division, speaking in August 1997.

The government made us dam the Ngamoeyeik River then called on us to grow summer paddy. The construction site was 5 miles away, and we walked back and forth every day in the hot season, when it was really stinking hot. Each family in the region had to send people to dig. I heard that one pregnant woman died carrying loads of soil on her head. I had to hoe the ground. The work was enormously tiring. After we went home in the evening, they videotaped the day’s progress. The dam opened in 1995.

Summer paddy started in 1996. They didn't give seeds, we had to buy them. I'll tell you something, they made us buy seeds taken from other farmers. But different strains of rice were all mixed together, one from here, one from there. When we planted we didn't notice the difference, but they grew at different rates. There were three different kinds of rice, so what can you do about that? You can't do anything! You would have to harvest one field three different times, which is too much work. Farmers were furious—some destroyed the whole lot and planted beans or sesame, then bought paddy in the market for their quota.

Well, by this time most monsoon paddy had been harvested, and people had planted their beans. But with the dam finished everybody had to grow summer rice. They told us we couldn't grow nuts, we had to grow paddy. Officials from Rangoon, not soldiers, came and ripped up the beans and even unharvested rice. That was just about the last straw. The government said, "We are making you grow summer paddy for you yourselves to eat." They said monsoon paddy is for government and summer paddy would be for farmers.

When we needed water they didn't open the dam; when we didn’t want water they gave it! At first they didn't release water as some people hadn't finished harvesting all of their crop. Summer paddy needs water, so the government opened the dam and way too much water poured out. People who hadn't finished harvesting their first crop rushed out to gather it all up. In bean fields, water flooded the landscape. Villagers asked, "What are you doing? We can't even live here any more." Then the government answered "If you can't stay then get out—we're just following instructions." Later they cut the water and the summer rice started drying up in the fields. People ended up pumping in water themselves, which was expensive. The administration said, "You farmers are dishonest. When you need something we give it, then you protest. We can't follow your whims any more." The authorities said farmers are inconsistent and don't do things right.

Farmers were now losing their crops. So villagers went to break open the dam themselves. The authorities became angry and said, "You went to break open this dam, so you must relocate!" The village leaders outlined their case step by step, then the authorities understood a little. We didn't have to relocate, but we had to help repair the dam. We nearly died in the stinking hot weather.

The authorities didn’t come to see areas where the paddy was flooded. You can't know about that. They come and take video footage of areas where the crop is good, where it's green and ripe. The stuff that didn't grow they don't show- you can't say anything about that. Due to flooding, a lot of paddy got wet and smelled foul, so when we took it to the procuring agents they said that it wasn't good paddy and refused to accept it. As a result of all this, nobody is producing enough paddy. No farmer has enough to eat. This is what I know from my own experiences and what I myself have witnessed.

All of the fields in this area are in this situation. This year there's a lot of grasses and weeds among the paddy, and a lot of insects too- that's Burma paddy, not the same as Thailand. The whole of the township has these conditions. The government just says that the farmers don't behave honestly. They say that if we behaved honestly things wouldn't be like this.

My son-in-law and I had to give more than 80 baskets of paddy quota. He has about six acres of fields, and if he works the paddy problem-free he can get 200 baskets. This year, he got less than 200. The administrators come and calculate the paddy grain production per acre by walking around to find an area where there's a lot of stalks, and stripping stalks until the grain has filled one cup, so then they can say how many stalks it takes to fill one cup and from that how much each acre will produce. If you take stalks from an area where there's dense growth like that then two or three stalks will fill one can. So they said that one acre would produce 80 to 90 baskets. My son and I have six acres of land to plant, but now, through deliberate over-estimate by officials, it’s become seven! Really it's six, but they registered it as seven. When the paddy has actually fully grown they don't calculate on the basis of the true yield- you have to give what was demanded based on estimates.

Our land was flooded, so we hired a pump. He had only about 60 baskets left, which we took to the administration—the entire lot, and not a single basket was left. But they said, "This grain is no good, we don't want it," and they made him bring it all back. He couldn't think any more, and went to get the whole lot husked. They said that the paddy was rotten, and wouldn't accept it. They're also looking at the chaff, and if there's too much rubbish they're not taking it. This is because some people started to mix their grain with dirt and other stuff to increase the apparent quantity. People said, "There's a lot of chaff and dirt because we stay in a dusty place." Others use bribes- a couple of bottles of alcohol here and there and maybe you can get 10 baskets off your quota.

Now I've come to Thailand to do some trading, sell medicines and stuff, instead of working there. There's nothing to be gained from it.


Return to Top 34. A civil servant Next

A 40 year old government administrator from Pyinmana Township, Mandalay Division, speaking in June 1997.

I have been a member of the civil service for 18 years, and my current salary is only 1200 kyat. A government salary nowadays isn't worth enough for a single trip to the market. My wife is also a government employee and our combined income is not much more than 2000 kyat per month. There are the usual deductions made from our wages- this is a common thing for government employees. The net total of our salaries leaves only about 1400 kyat for food. The government, however, has a scheme for disbursing an additional 300 kyat per month to employees. Anybody who is absent from 5 days of work in a month is not eligible. In actual fact, the government is not increasing workers’ wages. This 300 kyat welfare payment is simply a ploy to get workers to do more and stay in their workplaces. Previously, although our wages were low, we were better off. Nowadays, if only one member of a household works, the wage wouldn't even be enough for oneself, let alone the whole family. So workers these days have to plan their families carefully to avoid having additional children. They don't need new members of the family causing everybody to be sucked further into the agony of poverty and want.


Return to Top

PEOPLE'S TRIBUNAL ON FOOD SCARCITY AND MILITARIZATION IN BURMA
Email: tribunal@ahrchk.org

Home| About the Tribunal | Activities to Date | Upcoming Events | Contact Us | Site Map