Appendix 3: Depositions to the Tribunal

INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF INQUIRY SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE FINDINGS THE NEXUS RECOMMENDATIONS
APPENDICES MAPS GLOSSARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INDEX HOME
Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4 Appendix 5 Appendix 6 Appendix 7

The following are excerpts from oral testimonies made
before the Tribunal in April 1999.

First Witness Ninth Witness Saw Htoo K'baw
Acharn Pornpimon Trichot Thra Paw Moo Saw Roman
Hseng Noung Lintner Naw Miroline Nyunt Thein
Fourth Witness Kyan Du Saw Hsar K'baw
Padoh Kwe Htoo Win Saw Lay Thaw Khun Kham Koh
Saw Ehna Saw Tin Win  
Khu Turein Thra Lawrence Po  

Return to Top First Witness

The First Witness represents an NGO providing food and relief assistance to Burmese refugees in Thailand. The personal details of the Witness cannot be given. This Witness said that there are 12 camps in Thailand housing 115,000 people, and 4 more are across the border. Since the fall of Karen National Union (KNU) headquarters in 1995, the Burma army controls the border and there are more restrictions on movement of refugees. The Witness observed: "The refugees are increasingly aid-dependent. Aid agencies now provide virtually all food, including rice, salt, fish paste, yellow beans and oil, as well as building materials, mosquito nets and blankets."

The First Witness explained the impact of the Government’s forced relocation programs. "Relocations are usually done to facilitate 'development' work, such as roads and bridges at the new site. People are ordered to meet paddy quotas but are no longer able to do so as their villages have been relocated. This year, soldiers are no longer provided with rice and have been ordered to find their own rations. They go to villages, take the rice they need to feed themselves for a short time and destroy what remains. They don't order people to bring it to distribution points. Orders can be in verbal or written form, and relocation instructions allow villagers as little as three days. Orders are made regardless of whatever work the people may be doing at the time. For example, at harvest times people are ordered to work at construction sites. Families send their children while parents continue the harvest." The Witness stated that the military relocates populations to secure areas and also to create a labor force in those areas. The Witness was asked whether paddy land is available for at relocation sites. "No. For example, the relocations about two years ago in Karenni State involved 70-80,000 people, and entire regions full of villages were moved. People had four choices: 1) go to the relocation site, under Burma army control; 2) go to find relatives in a local town and stay with them; 3) become displaced in the forest; 4) cross the border into Thailand, as a last resort. The vast majority of people don't want to come. Many Karenni went to the relocation site at Shadaw, and now two years later we see people arriving in Thailand from the relocation site because they simply could not survive there. They tried. There are people who said their father starved to death. And somebody said, 'This does not happen in Burma, people do not starve.' But this is what it's come to in some areas. They've been displaced for over two years. They've tried and tried to make ends meet and now finally they've decided they cannot any longer and they've come to the border. And we're talking about weeks walking. These are long journeys, and when you've got maybe five children and you've got to find food on the way it's extremely difficult. The good thing in them coming across the border now is that we can get firsthand information." Generally, a relocation area is an area under military control. "Usually they are impoverished lands that no one else wants. The people are given no assistance in any form. The big issue is that whereas before people were dislocated due to fighting between the Burma army and the ethnic insurgencies, and the villagers were caught in the middle so they had to flee; now it's not because of any offensives that we are seeing them having to move. It's directly because of military activities against civilian villages. The Burma army specifically order civilians to clear out of areas they have lived in throughout their lives. More are planned. The army marks off an area and send the orders to clear it."

The Witness explained that there are large numbers of internally displaced persons (IDPs) "yet the concern is that nobody recognizes the existence of IDPs. The SPDC says that there are no IDPs, therefore no organizations working inside Burma cannot address the issue. They are prevented from traveling around." The Witness said: "It's not that internal displacement has just begun happening. I think it's been going on for years, but they had their own mechanisms to deal with it. And the reality is people survive on very little. Another aid group divides people into three categories: (1) those with enough rice for two or three meals per day, but not enough to see them through to the next harvest; (2) those with enough rice for one meal per day and one of boiled rice/roots; (3) those with no rice, who live off boiled roots. So people survive on the barest minimum. They've had to run all their lives. Some people have moved 14 times in the last 20 years." The Witness was asked: "(Q: In your opinion, if most of the people coming across the border weren't being chased, if there were no free-fire zones, do most of them feel they could survive where they have come from?) Yes. That's all they want. These people who came across are not looking for aid. I don't think the rural populations could care less about who's in power in Rangoon. For them it's not about democracy. For them it's to be left alone in peace. (Q: So you would support the basic thesis of this Tribunal, which is that access to food for large sections of Burmese people has become a serious problem?) Yes, and it's becoming an increasing problem. It's a serious problem now and from what we are seeing, it's an ever-growing problem. We see no sign of it improving in any way."


Return to Top Acharn Pornpimon Trichot Next

She is at the Researcher, Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University. She says that the trouble started after 1990 when the state began interfering with the people too much. She says: "The Government has two arms for control. One is the army, the soldiers themselves, the other is the bureaucracy. To have these two organizations work, you have to support them. The military needs food and privileges. The civil service is needed to run things like the paddy quota and taxation systems, and they also need their rice and salaries." She was questioned: "(Q: It has been mentioned that they have reached a point where the army also has had to cut back on privileges. So it can’t even feed itself?) I would say that. And it has resulted in soldiers taking rice and anything they can get their hands on from the people. They used to have an excuse to take this action against the minority ethnic groups, but against their own people it is a very bad sign. Out of poverty they are doing that. It’s surprising, because even for a hardcore military to do things like this that affect people can be very dangerous."


Return to Top Hseng Noung Lintner Next

She is a photo-journalist/translator. She was originally from Shan State. She is now a Swedish citizen. She meets people at the Burma border and she can collect information which she can pass on to NGOs. She says: "Shans always grew enough rice for three uses: (1) for themselves; (2) for religious offerings; (3) for guests. The land in Shan State is so fertile that if you just throw the seed it will grow, if nothing is disturbed and there are no interruptions. The government claims that its operations are counter-insurgency, but they have always had the upper hand. It is just a policy of annihilation, without ever questioning why there is insurgency all over the country. Relocated people have to leave an area where they are already growing crops and go to another area where they have no land. They go and then can’t make a living and, not being close to any border, go into the forest and try to survive. But they still need cash to buy clothing and salt. To survive they need more than just rice. On the hillside the only crop they can grow is opium, so that’s also why production increased." After 1988, the army was expanded: "They began facing the issue of how to feed this big army, now stronger than before. So they now demand that soldiers take care of their own food supply, and from there the problems have increased. They confiscate land and instruct people to work for the army, growing food or building barracks. Even if households have only old people or children, they must go."

She further says: "Yet what the military is doing doesn’t make sense. On the one hand they talk about more production, on the other they are putting more pressure on people. In the town of Murng Phan, Shan State, for example, a river used to go around the town, but now they have filled it with earth, and for what reason? The river was not very big, but it was enough for the town. And now people can’t grow rice because of that. It used to be that if people didn’t have enough rice in their fields they would find some cash and buy rice to fill the quota, if they couldn’t avoid it. But now there is not enough rice to buy on the black market. There’s not even that. Shan State used to have a self-reliant barter system. People growing rice could trade with people growing tea and beans, and so on. But now that has been interrupted by demands from the central administration. A lot of rice grown in Shan State goes out, so there is less for those not growing for themselves. Rice imports to Shan State from central Burma are prohibited, so that must have some effect."


Return to Top Fourth Witness Next

She works on emergency relief to refugees along the Thailand-Burma border. Her personal details cannot be published. She says: "[A] huge forced relocation program in Shan State started in 1996. In early 1996, around 20,000 [refugees] came in [to Thailand] and the total number of arrivals had increased to about 80,000 by early 1998. Since November-December 1998 until now the number has again gone up. We monitor conditions at border villages through headmen, who keep very detailed monthly records on where the people have come from, how many etc. Without exception, all the people are coming from forced relocation. They come for a variety of reasons connected to relocation." She says that in the last few months a large number has come to Thailand. In one crossing point "we monitor thoroughly, we have records of about 1500 crossings per month. There are several other points." She says how people are forced to leave: "Three or five days after a relocation order is given, the soldiers come back. If the villagers haven’t left, either they’ll say ‘go now,’ or burn the village, or shoot—there are so many different scenarios. This has happened to 1460 villages in the central Shan State area. Then if they’re caught back at the village they’re told they’ll be shot on sight. Most of the villagers haven’t got permission to go back. A rough estimate from various sources is that out of 300,000 people who were relocated, 100-120,000 have come to Thailand. About 100,000 are in the relocation sites, and then about 50,000 have gone to other areas in Shan State, maybe on the periphery of towns where they can find work, have relatives and so on. About 50,000 are hiding. They don’t want to go to the relocation sites and are trying to survive in the jungles." She explains how people still desire to go back, but they are not allowed: "After the relocations started, there were some people who came to Thailand straight away, who weren’t going to try to survive at the relocation sites. Some people went to the relocation sites and tried to survive but couldn’t, and when their supplies ran out, they came to Thailand. Some people have gone to the relocation sites, haven’t managed to survive there and have gone back into hiding in the area, to cultivate fields in the hills. They can’t hide in large groups, and tend to stay only a couple at a time. And often this is very different from what they are used to, because the Shans live in valleys. But they can’t stay in the valleys, because they’d be targets, so they have to stay in the hills and cultivate hill fields, living in the jungles which they’re not used to. It’s a very different lifestyle that they’re forced to live."

She narrated the tragic story of a 17-year-old girl whom she met the previous day: "Her family was relocated to Kun Hing in 1996, from a village just south of there. Her family first went to the relocation site and tried to stay but couldn’t. They tried various means. So she, her father, her mother, and three younger brothers and sisters went back into hiding after a year. There’s a river with lots of islands on it, so they hid on an island. She said there were two families on the one island, which was heavily wooded. They stayed there for two years and her father made money by fishing, as they planted a little rice but it wasn’t enough. He would go out on a boat and at night he would go secretly to Kun Hing and sell the fish in the market. Just last month he went back to his old village, to try to get some cattle he left there, to sell them. He was shot and killed. The family lost their breadwinner, so they moved to Kun Hing and the mother sent her to Thailand to earn money."


Return to Top Padoh Kwe Htoo Win Next

He is Chairman of KNU’s Mergui-Tavoy District [Tenasserim Division]. He says that in the February 1997 offensive "Out of the 217 Karen villages in the region, 80% were destroyed, deserted or forcibly relocated by the Burma army. Forcibly relocated people have had no chance to grow rice." He says "IDPs groups vary in size. The smallest has 2 or 3 families, the largest 30-40. According to our data, the total number of IDPs in the Tenasserim region is around 20,000. They survive in the forest any way they can. We stay with them, we travel with them and try to assist. Some do not have enough food, especially in the rainy season, but they try to survive. If they do not have rice, they boil bamboo shoots and roots. We can’t take food to them, but if we get some assistance like cash from NGOs or friends we distribute it. They can buy food, because they have some contact with people at relocation sites. The biggest concentration of IDPs in our area would be in Palaw and Eastern Mergui Townships. People in Palaw Township who were situated along the Tenasserim River fled into the mountains rather than go to the sites. Medicine is a problem. We try to help, but there is never enough. Malaria is especially prevalent."


Return to Top Saw Ehna Next

He is Deputy Editor of Kwe Ka Lu, a Karen language newspaper. Last year, his editor had asked him to go and study the IDP situation in the Tenasserim Division. That is how he has first hand information. He could move only with great difficulty. When he met IDPs, he asked them: "‘What do you think about your future?’ but mostly they just answered that they flee the Burma army and die in the jungle of poverty and starvation, that’s better for them than living under the Burma army. The biggest thing for them is to flee the army. When they are hiding, also they are afraid, so they don’t think about whether or not they will starve or die in the jungle. They just want to get away from the Burma army. Sometimes I asked, ‘How long will you live in the jungle, how long will you hide?’ but they didn’t answer. They have no plans other than to get away from the army. Staying as IDPs, they eat fish, wild potatoes, bamboo shoots. If they can get a rice crop, they can survive. The problem is that when they plant rice, the Burma army come and destroy it, so sometimes they have little food left, and they have to ration it out and mix the rice with leaves and bamboo shoots to make it last. The villagers are classified as supporters of KNU, and the Burma army has a strategy especially to destroy food, crops and fields, and to arrest or shoot people on sight. This is a free-fire zone, so they can shoot without questions, or sometimes arrest and later torture and kill." According to him, the future for people there is not good.


Return to Top Khu Turein Next

He is from Karenni State. There is little flat land there. Most agricultural land is under hillside cultivation. Most people live in forests, farming on hill slopes. In 1982, the Government began forced purchases of rice, partly to pressure the people not to support the revolution. "Since 1992, the military government has required summer paddy in Karenni areas, and this has created many hardships. In the beginning growing one crop per year was sufficient, but the summer crop meant depleted the soil so even the monsoon crop wasn’t good anymore. Another thing was when they introduced seeds to use for the summer crop they brought them from another area, and these were unfamiliar to the local people. Land owners had to irrigate for summer rice at their own expense, which was very costly. The reservoirs didn’t have enough water. At first, the administration sold fertilizer, but later they stopped and the crop yield fell."

In 1996, forced relocation began. He says: "Firstly, they sent written orders to villages with fixed dates by which to arrive at the relocation camps. If people didn’t follow the order, when the military arrived, they burned the village. In 1996 there was one example of some elderly people left behind in a village with some rice to eat by villagers who had left. The families hoped to return to the elderly people later. They wrote in front of the houses that ‘we have left some old people behind here, please do not harm them because they are too old to travel to the relocation camp.’ But when the troops came and inspected the village and saw the people left behind, they reacted angrily, as if the people didn’t obey them, and burned down the houses with the people in them." He also says: "From 1997 to the present, most families in relocation sites couldn’t eat rice, and had to eat maize- if they were able to grow it. Most go to beg in nearby towns, and some people can offer them rice, a tin or two, or sometimes just one or two spoons full. There are also some villages that have not been relocated, but the people in these places must pay a lot of fees, serve as porters and so on. The army demands logs, porters, money, and even cattle manure to make fertilizer for the town garden, which the people would otherwise have used on their own land. People are not paid for these things. If they do not provide as ordered, they will probably be punished by having to do labor at a military outpost, such as digging trenches and doing domestic work for the soldiers."


Return to Top Ninth Witness Next

This witness is from Shan State. For security reasons she cannot be identified. She says: "Before 1998, the situation in Shan State was easier, as most families had sufficient income and food. At this time there are a lot more difficulties. The deteriorating conditions relate to the broader militarization of Burma. The government purchases rice forcibly and at very low prices, such as one-fifth the market value. If you can not or do not sell to the government then they take action against you." Here also there is forced relocation: "Forced relocation has come to Shan State. In the south, townships like Pin Lone, Murng Nai, Larng Kher and so on have had to move in their entirety. The Burma army has carried out relocation the same as in Karenni State, issuing deadlines and threats that they will come back and harm the villagers. According to government development plans, whenever they want to extend a road from place to place they confiscate land and destroy houses and crops without compensation."


Return to Top Thra Paw Moo Next

He is a teacher from one of the refugee camps. He was a government employee under the socialist regime. He says: "As a Grade 2 civil servant, I got some rations and 750 kyat/month. The food benefits were not free. We could buy rice at the discounted government rate. At that time, one pyi of rice at the market rate was about 13 kyat, so my salary of 750 kyat made me quite well off. But now the price of rice has gone up to at least 80 kyat per pyi, yet the pay hasn’t risen. Of course, workers are unable to make ends meet, so they are forced into corruption to survive." He came to Thailand in 1991 and since then he has not gone back.


Return to Top Naw Miroline Next

She came to Thailand in February this year, "to find work, as the cost of living is now so high there, and there are no ways to earn an income." She worked in Irrawaddy Division as a farm laborer. Whatever she earned planting rice in the rainy season was not enough to survive the year. This is the fate of all farm laborers. She referred to the paddy quota system: "In our area there is a paddy quota set by the military, at the rate of 12 baskets per acre. The government pays about half the market rate. The quota is paid by the land owner, not workers like me. If they don’t pay the quota, they can be arrested." Some people borrow paddy from others. Some families don’t have enough for their own consumption, particularly when the food crop is affected by floods etc.


Return to Top Kyan Du Next

He arrived in Thailand this year. He worked on a rubber plantation in Pa-an Township. He says: "Before it was converted, this land was peanut fields and swidden cultivation. The military said that these fields weren’t real farms, took the land and converted it to a rubber plantation. They declared it a development project. It was the villagers’ land, and they paid taxes on it. It was difficult, but people would find a way." Now, that is no longer the case, as the farmers have lost their lands and earn a marginal income from subsistence labor.


Return to Top Saw Lay Thaw Next

He was in the 1988 uprising. He had to flee in 1989. At first he worked in the revolutionary areas. Later he stayed in a refugee camp. He also collects information from people who have fled Burma. Based on his experience, he says: "It is clear that there is now real scarcity of food. For example, at the time I left, a cup of tea was one and a half kyat. Now it is 20 to 30 kyat. But who can afford tea when one pyi of rice is at least 70 to 80 kyat? From the information I have collected, this is my assessment of the situation. It has become worse and worse until the point that some people now even have to sell the water poured off from boiled rice [for others to drink]."


Return to Top Saw Tin Win Next

He is from Karen State. He travels back and forth through the border regions as a member of the KNU Forestry Department. He says: "In my area, there is a demarcated forest that I have to monitor, although it’s not under firm control of the KNU. This is a ‘black’ zone. There are still about 20 villages in the area. In 1998, there wasn’t enough rain and this meant that people couldn’t grow crops. In this area orders have been given for people to relocate, but instead they fled into KNU areas and they have been able to get some supplies of food and rice sent by aid agencies." He has some hope that people may be able to go back and cultivate.


Return to Top Thra Lawrence Po Next

He has stayed in Thailand since 1982. He is originally from the Irrawaddy Division. He says: "Before 1962, there was plenty of rice, both for exports and for people in the country. And a Burmese administrator said to me at the time of the take-over, ‘We are not afraid for our economic situation. Our country has the best rice exports in Asia. We are afraid only that the Thais will give arms to invaders’. Yet now Thailand has greater exports, although they did not supply invaders. And because of nationalization and ineptitude, staff were not able to perform their tasks. They are clever in other ways, but not good at administration."


Return to Top Saw Htoo K’baw Next

He stayed in Kyauk Kyi Township until 1997. His statement is recorded in the Submission made by AHRC. In 1997 he had to leave Burma. He says: "My village was destroyed. Also, I had worked as a swidden farmer when I was there, and up to 1997 it was still possible to grow something. The Burma army didn’t come to tell us to move. They just came in, patrolled up and down, shot at random and killed people sometimes. They didn’t give any orders or details. If they saw people they just killed them. So in this area we hid our rice stocks in the forest, but if the army saw them then they burned everything."


Return to Top Saw Roman Next

He is from the same place as the previous witness. He talks of the Four Cuts operation that began in 1973-74 and says: "We were driven from our villages in great numbers, cattle taken, people murdered. That operation was called ‘Operation Aung Soe.’ At the time, I was a schoolboy, and I remember that my relatives – uncles, parents, young people and old – had to serve on forced labor projects. We were terrified by their cruelty and fled. People were arrested and tied to trees. Some who escaped died fleeing, others made their way out with nothing, some even without clothes. Some who were recaptured were tortured and executed. It was a disaster for our people. Starting from that time, our troubles have increased steadily, including those regarding food."

He talks of the quota system which does not take into account the actual production. He says: "They get the quota but still they go around the place demanding other things and bullying the people. In December 1998, my family couldn’t meet the quota and had to buy rice at the rate of 50,000 kyat for 100 baskets, which we resold to the government for 30,000 kyat. So they make at least a 20,000 kyat profit. Anyway, I worked yellow beans to get some money back. These things happen all around Kyauk Kyi Township, not only in my area. There are a lot of swidden farms there too, so people have to go to the hillsides to harvest, but nowadays they don’t allow people to go. It’s very dangerous to collect a harvest." He also says: "Many people in my area have experienced far greater suffering than we. We are some of the lucky ones, to be able to leave. I consider Burma my home and my land, but because of the gross injustice and abuse there, we are forced to run away from our country. We had grown a rice crop up until this year. I had even planted a new crop, but we just had to leave it all. If we reaped some and sold it to get some money for the journey then people would have been suspicious. So we lost everything."


Return to Top Nyunt Thein Next

He is from Karen State. He was working as a betel nut farmer. The Burma army entered his village in 1997. In 1998, he had to flee. He says: "After the Burma army came in, we tried to stay for a year, but we had to do forced labor for them and serve as porters. We had to pay various fees and taxes if we didn’t work, or serve as porters. Every month it came out to thousands of kyat. When you are a porter, you have to feed yourself or give 1000 kyat per day for a substitute. I couldn’t bear it any more, but anyway we stayed on, in spite of everything they forced us to do. Then they shot dead four villagers, so finally I didn’t dare to stay. I couldn’t bring any of my crop with me, and the soldiers got my buffalo. I don’t dare to go and live there any more, so whoever wanted to eat those nuts did so; whether Burma army troops, villagers, or whoever. I had to leave my land and everything behind. So did many others." He went back to his house once after coming here, about a month before he deposed before us. He says that every thing of his had been taken or eaten.


Return to Top Saw Hsar K’baw Next

He came to Thailand in 1984. Now he works in a refugee camp as a teacher. He says: "Last year I went to work at a timber mill in the area of Karen State, only a few hours from the border. In that area, I saw many people living displaced without shelter, in huts by the streams and in the hills. Most of them had come from Myawaddy and Kya-Inn Seik Kyi Townships. But they couldn’t cross into Thailand, because the DKBA didn’t want them to leave. The DKBA said they would feed the people, but I saw that most of them didn’t have enough food. They all faced the same problems, losing their land, paying too many fees, serving as porters and not having work. People have no way to support their families. So they thought that it would be better to go to the refugee camps. They came but cannot pass the DKBA. Also the Thai military doesn’t want people coming in. It’s very hard for them. Now I’ve heard that many of those people have tried to find new places in the hills and jungles. The biggest problem is that there is no medicine. They can find food, but when they get sick there are no medicines, and some die. Sometimes sick people are allowed to travel to refugee camp clinics, but usually by that time they are already in a critical condition and die soon after."


Return to Top Khun Kham Koh Next

He was originally from Shan State. He was a member of the Pa’o National Organisation. In 1991, they made a cease fire deal with the Burma army. He did not approve of this. He is now a member of Independent Historical Research Association – Pa’o. He says: "During the U Nu period, according to the statements of elders that I have documented, food and agriculture conditions were good. After Ne Win’s take over in 1962, things began to get worse. Some people suffered from starvation at that time. When the military government came up with the Burmese Way to Socialism, only army officers could take senior administrative positions. But these officers didn’t have technical expertise needed for managing agriculture, and were ignorant of the different conditions of the places they were assigned. In Pa’o areas, people were ordered to work crops which were untenable and without any support for the farmers. The administrators came at harvest time and scolded people for crop shortfalls, without ever having helped or knowing what they were talking about. Some people who hadn’t produced anything at all lied out of fear, saying ‘we got this much or that much.’"

Although last year there was little rain, the Government demanded its quota. So "the villagers had to buy rice. They couldn’t do anything else. One half basket of paddy cost 700 kyat in the market. The government set the purchase rate at 200 kyat. They lost 500 kyat per half basket. If they didn’t comply, they would have their land confiscated by the military. When land is confiscated, the army puts up signs saying ‘Military area: no trespassing’. That’s why people know they have to pay the quota. To survive people eat a boiled mixture of rice, potato and wild wheat. The situation is the same for many villages." He also explained how this has resulted in increased narcotics production: "Farmers unable to cultivate rice to eat and sell will ultimately grow drugs. The drug plantations are small and easily hidden. So annual production of narcotics is increasing and there is competition between drugs and food. For example, in Shan State increased production of narcotic drugs has resulted in reduced production of citrus fruit plantations. One has directly offset the other. Yet people are simply growing these drugs to get money to buy food. They can’t see any other way. So this is a big problem."


Return to Top

PEOPLE'S TRIBUNAL ON FOOD SCARCITY AND MILITARIZATION IN BURMA
Email: tribunal@ahrchk.org

Home| About the Tribunal | Activities to Date | Upcoming Events | Contact Us | Site Map